Grasping affordances with the other's hand: a TMS study.

The power of an object to afford a suitable act has been shown to depend on its reachability. Nevertheless, most of our perception and action occur in a social context. Little research has directly explored whether the possibility for other people to act upon an object may affect our processing of its affording features. To tackle this issue, we magnetically stimulated the left primary motor cortex and recorded motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) while participants were presented with a handled object (i.e. a mug) close either to them or to a virtual individual such as an avatar. We found highest MEPs both when the mug was near enough to be actually reachable for the participants and also when it was out of reach for them, provided that it was ready to the avatar's hand. We propose that this effect is likely to be due to an interpersonal bodily space representation, which plays critical role in basic social interaction.

[1]  T Brochier,et al.  Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Alessandra Lee Michelle Torres,et al.  OUT OF BODY , 2006 .

[3]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Gaetano Tieri,et al.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  M. Costantini,et al.  Tie my hands, tie my eyes. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Derambure,et al.  Perceiving What Is Reachable Depends on Motor Representations: Evidence from a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2008, PloS one.

[8]  Giorgia Committeri,et al.  Ready Both to Your and to My Hands: Mapping the Action Space of Others , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  P. Haggard,et al.  Shared representations in body perception. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[11]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[12]  C. Spence,et al.  Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Mirror Neurons Differentially Encode the Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space of Monkeys , 2009, Science.

[18]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  M Poncet,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[21]  Luca Turella,et al.  When Gaze Turns into Grasp , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Coding of Visual Space during Motor Preparation: Approaching Objects Rapidly Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Hand-Centered Coordinates , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression , 2007, Cognition.

[25]  Matthew A. Paul,et al.  Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Understanding Actions of Others: The Electrodynamics of the Left and Right Hemispheres. A High-Density EEG Neuroimaging Study , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  How the gaze of others influences object processing , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Michel-Ange Amorim,et al.  "What is my avatar seeing?": The coordination of "out-of-body" and "embodied" perspectives for scene recognition across views , 2003 .

[35]  D. Bub,et al.  Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Distinct visual perspective-taking strategies involve the left and right medial temporal lobe structures differently. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[39]  M. L. Demattè,et al.  Beyond the window: multisensory representation of peripersonal space across a transparent barrier. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[40]  Hiroaki Ishida,et al.  Shared Mapping of Own and Others' Bodies in Visuotactile Bimodal Area of Monkey Parietal Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural Correlates of First-Person Perspective as One Constituent of Human Self-Consciousness , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Costantini,et al.  The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.