The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory

Visual working memory (VWM) is essential for many cognitive processes, yet it is notably limited in capacity. Visual perception processing is facilitated by Gestalt principles of grouping, such as connectedness, similarity, and proximity. This introduces the question, do these perceptual benefits extend to VWM? If so, can this be an approach to enhance VWM function by optimizing the processing of information? Previous findings have demonstrated that several Gestalt principles (connectedness, common region, and spatial proximity) do facilitate VWM performance in change detection tasks (Jiang, Olson, & Chun, 2000; Woodman, Vecera, & Luck, 2003; Xu, 2002, 2006; Xu & Chun, 2007). However, one prevalent Gestalt principle, similarity, has not been examined with regard to facilitating VWM. Here, we investigated whether grouping by similarity benefits VWM. Experiment 1 established the basic finding that VWM performance could benefit from grouping. Experiment 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that similarity was only effective when the similar stimuli were proximal. In short, the VWM performance benefit derived from similarity was constrained by spatial proximity, such that similar items need to be near each other. Thus, the Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual perception, but it can provide benefits to VWM as well.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Location and binding in visual working memory , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[3]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Configural representations in spatial working memory: modulation by perceptual segregation and voluntary attention , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  Gestalt Theory , 2019, Theories and Applications of Counseling and Psychotherapy: Relevance Across Cultures and Settings.

[7]  Edward Awh,et al.  Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Visual grouping in human parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Relationship between uniform connectedness and proximity in perceptual grouping , 2003, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences.

[10]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Encoding color and shape from different parts of an object in visual short-term memory , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[13]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Send Correspondence to , 2005 .

[14]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[16]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Grouping does not require attention , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2010 .

[18]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[19]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[20]  R. Marois,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Uniform connectedness and classical gestalt principles of perceptual grouping , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The description and analysis of object and event perception. , 1986 .

[26]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Liqiang Huang,et al.  What is the unit of visual attention? Object for selection, but Boolean map for access. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Symmetry and binding in visuo-spatial working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Hollingworth.  Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Yaoda Xu.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness , 2006, Perception & Psychophysics.

[33]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[34]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[35]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[36]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[37]  J. Driver,et al.  New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[39]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Characterizing the Limits of Human Visual Awareness , 2007, Science.

[41]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[42]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[43]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  R. Wilton,et al.  Grouping by Proximity or Similarity? Competition between the Gestalt Principles in Vision , 1998, Perception.

[45]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[46]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[47]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004 .

[48]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[49]  M. Kubovy,et al.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: a probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. , 2008, Psychological review.

[50]  D. Sagi,et al.  Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations , 1995, Vision Research.