Recognition of Objects Displayed with Incomplete Sets of Discrete Boundary Dots

Most extant theories of shape perception assume or assert that various contour attributes, and in particular, the orientation, curvature and linear extent of the contours provide essential object recognition cues. The present study examined this proposal using discrete dots that marked locations on the outer boundary of namable objects, providing shape-patterns similar to silhouettes. For each shape, the display initially provided only a sampling of the total number of dots in the boundary, and the number of dots was periodically increased until the participant named the object. There were three treatment conditions in which the initial display as well as the periodic increments consisted of continuous arrays (strings) of dots, randomly positioned dots, or evenly spaced dots. Analysis showed objects were recognized with the fewest percentage of dots with the evenly spaced condition, and participants needed the greatest percentage with the contiguous array condition. In many cases objects could be identified when very few evenly spaced dots were shown, thereby providing large spacing between the dots. It seems unlikely that known neural mechanisms could extract contour attributes, e.g., orientation, curvature, and linear extent, from such sparse stimulus patterns, which provides a challenge to the proposition that these are essential shape cues.

[1]  N. Sutherland Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton A Parallel Computation that Assigns Canonical Object-Based Frames of Reference , 1981, IJCAI.

[3]  M. Wertheimer A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[4]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[5]  M. G. Preston,et al.  An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  E. Greene,et al.  Grid analysis: continuing the search for a metric of shape , 1987 .

[7]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Shapley,et al.  Visual spatial characterization of macaque V1 neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Stephen M. Pizer,et al.  Object representation by cores: Identifying and representing primitive spatial regions , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  P. Quinlan,et al.  Differing approaches to two-dimensional shape recognition. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[15]  David Marr,et al.  Visual information processing: artificial intelligence and the sensorium of sight , 1987 .

[16]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Coding theory of visual pattern completion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .