Default and Asset Correlation

If default dependence is the heart of credit-risk modelling, then an empirical estimate of its magnitude is of primordial importance. Unlike estimation of default probabilities, addressed in the previous chapter, the characterization of default dependence is model dependent rendering this task more difficult. Since different models incorporate the relationship between obligor defaults in alternative ways, dependence is governed by some subset of a model’s parameters. As usual, a variety of techniques are presented, examined, and concretely implemented. The first, based on the method of moments, applies quite generally and is conceptually similar to the calibration techniques employed in previous chapters. A second approach, using observed default outcomes, exploits conditional independence to build a likelihood function and applies in both mixture and threshold settings. This permits use of the maximum-likelihood framework for the production of both point and interval estimates. The final, somewhat complex and fragile, approach is only applicable to the family of threshold models. It enjoys the advantage of using all transition data, but simultaneously requires inference of the unobservable global state variable values. The robustness of the final two techniques are assessed within separate simulation studies.

[1]  M. Sklar Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[2]  J. Berger Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing? , 2003 .

[3]  A comparative anatomy of credit risk models , 1998 .

[4]  Alexander J. McNeil,et al.  Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools : Concepts, Techniques and Tools , 2015 .

[5]  L. Held,et al.  Applied Statistical Inference: Likelihood and Bayes , 2013 .

[6]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Multivariate T-Distributions and Their Applications , 2004 .

[7]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[8]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1981 .

[9]  One-Factor Fallacy , 1998 .

[10]  A. Sklar,et al.  Random variables, distribution functions, and copulas---a personal look backward and forward , 1996 .

[11]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[12]  Michael B. Gordy,et al.  Granularity Adjustment for Regulatory Capital Assessment , 2013 .

[13]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Chapter 8 – Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management , 2003 .

[14]  Jun Yan,et al.  Enjoy the Joy of Copulas: With a Package copula , 2007 .

[15]  Estimating Default Correlations from Short Panels of Credit Rating Performance Data , 2003 .

[16]  Benchmarking Asset Correlations , 2003 .

[17]  Eric Bouyé,et al.  Copulas for Finance - A Reading Guide and Some Applications , 2000 .

[18]  R. C. Merton,et al.  On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates , 1974, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[19]  Val Tannen,et al.  Reconcilable differences , 2009, ICDT.

[20]  Y. Pawitan In all likelihood : statistical modelling and inference using likelihood , 2002 .

[21]  P. Dhrymes Topics in Advanced Econometrics , 1989 .

[22]  L. Hansen Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[23]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[24]  Thierry Roncalli,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimate of Default Correlations , 2007 .

[25]  M. Magnello Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics , 2009 .

[26]  R. Wolpert,et al.  Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters , 1999 .