Perceptual Learning of Stereoacuity

It has often been noted that with repeated exposure to random-dot stereograms the time required to perceived depth decreases. Further, with extensive practice, stereoacuity thresholds have been shown to decrease. For both types of learning some researchers have reported specificity of the improvements to retinal location, and have thus suggested that the learning may be localised at early levels of visual processing, such as in primary visual cortex. However, these studies have not adequately ruled out the possibility that the specificity shown may be due to the operation of selective-spatial-attention mechanisms. In the present study this possibility was examined by training observers to judge the relative depth of a pair of stereograms presented equally often in two spatial locations, but stimuli were only presented with one direction of disparity (ie crossed or uncrossed) in any one location. Results indicated that, as expected, observers' judgments improved with practice. However, this improvement transferred completely to stimuli presented with the other direction of disparity in each location. Thus, it is argued that previous findings of retinal-location-specific improvements in stereoacuity may well be due to selective-spatial-attention mechanisms, rather than to learning localised at an early level of visual processing.

[1]  D. Glaser,et al.  Initial performance, learning and observer variability for hyperacuity tasks , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  V. Ramachandran Perceptual correlates of neural plasticity in the adult human brain , 1995 .

[3]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Weinman,et al.  Eye Dominance and Stereopsis , 1982, Perception.

[5]  A J O'Toole,et al.  Learning to See Random-Dot Stereograms , 1992, Perception.

[6]  S. Lehky,et al.  Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1991 Mar;11(3):following Table of Contents] , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  G C Woo,et al.  The effect of exposure time on the foveal size of Panum's area. , 1974, Vision research.

[8]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Fahle Visual learning in the hyperacuity range in adults. , 1993, German journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Ferster A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area , 1981, Vision Research.

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Three-dimensional stereoscopic display implementation: guidelines derived from human visual capabilities , 1990, Other Conferences.

[14]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis , 1976, Nature.

[16]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[17]  Transfer of Learning in Transformed Random-Dot Stereostimuli , 1982, Perception.

[18]  M C COLEBRANDER,et al.  The limits of stereoscopic vision. , 1948, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[19]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[20]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[21]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[22]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.