Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry

Monocular masking studies show that the visibility of a one-dimensional sinusoidal grating remains unchanged in the presence of masking noise filtered so as to contain spectral components that are at least two octaves away from the spatial frequency of the grating (Stromeyer and Julesz 1972). In the present study, random-dot stereograms were bandpass filtered in the two-dimensional Fourier domain, and masking noise of various spatial frequency bands was added to the filtered stereograms. Masking noise bands containing equally effective noise energy were selected such that their bands were either overlapping with the stereoscopic image spectrum or were two octaves distant. The first case resulted in binocular rivalry; however, in the second case stereoscopic fusion could be maintained in the presence of strong binocular rivalry owing to the masking noise. This finding indicates that spatial-frequency-tuned channels are not restricted to one-dimensional gratings but operate on two-dimensional patterns as well. Furthermore, these frequency channels are utilized in stereopsis and work independently from each other, since some of these channels can be in binocular rivalry while at the same time other channels yield fusion. The main binocular experiments are demonstrated.

[1]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  B. Julesz Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  B JULESZ,et al.  Binocular Depth Perception without Familiarity Cues , 1964, Science.

[5]  L. Kaufman ON THE NATURE OF BINOCULAR DISPARITY. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Stereoscopic Vision in Macaque Monkey: Cells sensitive to Binocular Depth in Area 18 of the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 1970, Nature.

[11]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[13]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Spatial arrangement of line, edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  R V Lange,et al.  Adapted and unadapted spatial frequency channels in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[16]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.