Recall of facial expressions and simple orientations reveals competition for resources at multiple levels of the visual hierarchy

Many studies of visual working memory have tested humans' ability to reproduce primary visual features of simple objects, such as the orientation of a grating or the hue of a color patch, following a delay. A consistent finding of such studies is that precision of responses declines as the number of items in memory increases. Here we compared visual working memory for primary features and high-level objects. We presented participants with memory arrays consisting of oriented gratings, facial expressions, or a mixture of both. Precision of reproduction for all facial expressions declined steadily as the memory load was increased from one to five faces. For primary features, this decline and the specific distributions of error observed, have been parsimoniously explained in terms of neural population codes. We adapted the population coding model for circular variables to the non-circular and bounded parameter space used for expression estimation. Total population activity was held constant according to the principle of normalization and the intensity of expression was decoded by drawing samples from the Bayesian posterior distribution. The model fit the data well, showing that principles of population coding can be applied to model memory representations at multiple levels of the visual hierarchy. When both gratings and faces had to be remembered, an asymmetry was observed. Increasing the number of faces decreased precision of orientation recall, but increasing the number of gratings did not affect recall of expression, suggesting that memorizing faces involves the automatic encoding of low-level features, in addition to higher-level expression information.

[1]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[2]  V. Salmela,et al.  Detection of small orientation changes and the precision of visual working memory , 2013, Vision Research.

[3]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Decoding complex flow-field patterns in visual working memory , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  D. Perrett,et al.  From single cells to social perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Sebastian Schneegans,et al.  No fixed item limit in visuospatial working memory , 2016, Cortex.

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  Gaoyan Zhang,et al.  Decoding facial expressions based on face‐selective and motion‐sensitive areas , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[9]  W. Ma,et al.  Factorial comparison of working memory models. , 2014, Psychological review.

[10]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[11]  Sebastian Schneegans,et al.  Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Drift in Neural Population Activity Causes Working Memory to Deteriorate Over Time , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Hui Chen,et al.  Amnesia for Object Attributes , 2015, Psychological science.

[14]  I. Gauthier,et al.  A visual short-term memory advantage for faces , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Shuo Wang,et al.  Neurons in the human amygdala selective for perceived emotion , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[20]  Håkan Fischer,et al.  Superior Recognition Performance for Happy Masked and Unmasked Faces in Both Younger and Older Adults , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[21]  Jussi Saarinen,et al.  Visual working memory for amplitude-modulated shapes. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[22]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[23]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Visual short-term memory for oriented, colored objects , 2017, Journal of vision.

[24]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Crowdsourced single-trial probes of visual working memory for irrelevant features , 2016, Journal of vision.

[26]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[27]  J. Palmer Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Zemel,et al.  Inference and computation with population codes. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Probabilistic Palimpsest Model of Visual Short-term Memory , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The Distributed Nature of Working Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[34]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  One and Done? Optimal Decisions From Very Few Samples , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[36]  Margaret C Jackson,et al.  Angry expressions strengthen the encoding and maintenance of face identity representations in visual working memory , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[37]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[38]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Identity modulates short-term memory for facial emotion , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[40]  G. Alpers,et al.  Emotional scenes and facial expressions elicit different psychophysiological responses. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  Disentangling the Representation of Identity from Head View Along the Human Face Processing Pathway , 2016, bioRxiv.

[43]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[44]  Hing Yee Eng,et al.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition , 2013, Cognition & emotion.

[46]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Dissociable Neural Patterns of Facial Identity across Changes in Viewpoint , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Emma Y. Wu,et al.  Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  C. Liu,et al.  Remembering faces with emotional expressions , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[49]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Reconstructing Perceived and Retrieved Faces from Activity Patterns in Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? , 2004, Psychological research.

[51]  K M Gothard,et al.  Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[53]  Robert Taylor,et al.  Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Noise in Neural Populations Accounts for Errors in Working Memory , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[57]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[59]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Frank Tong,et al.  Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.