Altruism in networks: the effect of connections

Why are individuals altruistic to their friends? Theory suggests that individual, relationship and network factors will all influence the levels of altruism; but to date, the effects of social network structure have received relatively little attention. The present study uses a novel correlational design to test the prediction that an individual will be more altruistic to friends who are well-connected to the individual's other friends. The result shows that, as predicted, even when controlling for a range of individual and relationship factors, the network factor (number of connections) makes a significant contribution to altruism, thus showing that individuals are more likely to be altruistic to better-connected members of their social networks. The implications of incorporating network structure into studies of altruism are discussed.

[1]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Michael E. Price,et al.  Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates , 2008 .

[3]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[4]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: a complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Social networks and trust , 1999 .

[7]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  The 1/d Law of Giving , 2010 .

[8]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[9]  D. Collard,et al.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1989 .

[10]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[11]  H. Gintis,et al.  Costly signaling and cooperation. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[13]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations , 1990 .

[14]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[15]  D. Buss.  Evolutionary personality psychology. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[17]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[18]  E. Uehara,et al.  Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Conditional cooperation on three continents , 2008 .

[20]  D. Fessler,et al.  Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. , 2005 .

[21]  John Tooby,et al.  Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. , 2002 .

[22]  R. Tindale,et al.  Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains , 2002 .

[23]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  O. John,et al.  Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German , 2007 .