Interactive Stitch Sampler

Electronic textiles, which integrate computation with fabrics through a redesigned interface of microcontrollers, sensors, and actuators, have expanded possibilities not only for engineering, fashion, and human-computer interaction but also for computer science education itself. While individual studies involving electronic textiles have shown promise to diversify participation, raise interest, and deepen learning in computing, especially for female students, we recognized a need to synthesize findings across studies to understand the overall contribution of electronic textiles to computing education. In this article, we report our findings from a meta-synthesis of 64 educational electronic textiles studies to answer the following questions in computing: (1) Did electronic textiles broaden access and participation? (2) How did electronic textiles support learners’ interests and sustain participation? (3) What and how did students learn from electronic textile projects? Our meta-synthesis revealed that although electronic textiles successfully broadened access, supported learners’ interests, and introduced basic computational concepts to novice learners, questions around equitable participation and deeper disciplinary engagement persist. We discuss directions for future design and research efforts to explore the full potential of e-textiles in computer science education.

[1]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  StitchFest: Diversifying a College Hackathon to Broaden Participation and Perceptions in Computing , 2015, SIGCSE.

[2]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Collaborative Maker Activities in the Classroom: Case Studies of High School Student Pairs' Interactions in Designing Electronic Textiles , 2016, FabLearn.

[3]  Edna Tan,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Equity-Oriented STEM-Rich Making Among Youth From Historically Marginalized Communities , 2018 .

[4]  Leah Buechley,et al.  The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education , 2008, CHI.

[5]  R. Estrella,et al.  Stuck in the Shallow End Education , Race , and Computing , 2008 .

[6]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  The LilyPad Arduino: Toward Wearable Engineering for Everyone , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[7]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Hands On, Hands Off: Gendered Access in Crafting and Electronics Practices , 2014 .

[8]  Sophie Skach,et al.  Making Grooves with Needles: Using e-textiles to Encourage Gender Diversity in Embedded Audio Systems Design , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[9]  Michael S. Horn Tangible Interaction and Cultural Forms: Supporting Learning in Informal Environments , 2018, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[10]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Leah Buechley,et al.  An e-sewing tutorial for DIY learning , 2010, IDC.

[12]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Gears of our childhood: constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future , 2013, IDC.

[13]  ZingaroDaniel BOOK REVIEWLearner-centered design of computing education , 2016 .

[14]  M. Sandelowski Unmixing mixed-methods research. , 2014, Research in nursing & health.

[15]  Ahmad Adamu Galadima,et al.  Arduino as a learning tool , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO).

[16]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Computing Whether She Belongs: Stereotypes Undermine Girls’ Interest and Sense of Belonging in Computer Science , 2016 .

[17]  Leah Buechley,et al.  LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[18]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Makeology : Makerspaces as Learning Environments (Volume 1) , 2016 .

[19]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  From Theory Bias to Theory Dialogue: Embracing Cognitive, Situated, and Critical Framings of Computational Thinking in K-12 CS Education , 2019, ICER.

[20]  Chris Proctor,et al.  Solder and Wire or Needle and Thread: Examining the Effects of Electronic Textile Construction Kits on Girls' Attitudes Towards Computing and Arts , 2018, ICLS.

[21]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Sewing interest in E-textiles: analyzing making from a gendered perspective , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[22]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach , 2009 .

[23]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[24]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  Sustaining Making in the Era of Accountability: STEM Integration Using E-Textiles Materials in a High School Physics Class , 2017, FabLearn.

[25]  Amon Millner,et al.  Modkit: blending and extending approachable platforms for creating computer programs and interactive objects , 2011, IDC.

[26]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Learner-Centered Design of Computing Education: Research on Computing for Everyone , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[27]  Kayla DesPortes,et al.  Where are the Glass-Boxes?: Examining the Spectrum of Modularity in Physical Computing Hardware Tools , 2017, IDC.

[28]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  A rubric for describing competences in the areas of circuitry, computation, and crafting after a course using e-textiles , 2017 .

[29]  Mia S. Shaw,et al.  Charting the Identity Turn in K-12 Computer Science Education: Developing More Inclusive Learning Pathways for Identities , 2020, ICLS.

[30]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Stitching Codeable Circuits: High School Students’ Learning About Circuitry and Coding with Electronic Textiles , 2017 .

[31]  Tomoko M. Nakajima,et al.  Putting Making into High School Computer Science Classrooms: Promoting Equity in Teaching and Learning with Electronic Textiles in Exploring Computer Science , 2018 .

[32]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Stitching Circuits: Learning About Circuitry Through E-textile Materials , 2013 .

[33]  Caitlin Kelleher,et al.  Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers , 2005, CSUR.

[34]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Textile messages : dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education , 2013 .

[35]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  The E-Textiles Bracelet Hack: Bringing Making to Middle School Classrooms , 2016, FabLearn.

[36]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  Functional Aesthetics for Learning: Creative Tensions in Youth e-Textile Designs , 2012, ICLS.

[37]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Makeology : Makers as Learners (Volume 2) , 2016 .

[38]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Culturally Responsive Making with American Indian Girls: Bridging the Identity Gap in Crafting and Computing with Electronic Textiles , 2015, GenderIT.

[39]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Social Design Experiments: Toward Equity by Design , 2016, Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Approaches to Design-Based Research.

[40]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  Critical Reflections on Teacher Conceptions of Race as Related to the Effectiveness of Science Learning , 2017 .

[41]  Leah Buechley,et al.  LilyPond: an online community for sharing e-textile projects , 2011, C&C '11.

[42]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Electrifying Engagement in Middle School Science Class: Improving Student Interest Through E-textiles , 2017 .

[43]  M. Guzdial Programming Environments for Novices , 1997 .

[44]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[45]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American indian youth and communities , 2014, SIGCSE.

[46]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[47]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Introduction to This Volume , 2016 .

[48]  David Clarke,et al.  Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective , 2009 .

[49]  Stephen Chi-fai Chan,et al.  The TeeBoard: an education-friendly construction platform for e-textiles and wearable computing , 2009, CHI.

[50]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Boys' Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles , 2015, ICER.

[51]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[52]  Allan L. Fisher,et al.  The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science , 2000 .

[53]  J. Hughes,et al.  The Use of E-Textiles in Ontario Education , 2018 .

[54]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Breaking boundaries: strategies for mentoring through textile computing workshops , 2011, CHI.

[55]  Joanna Goode,et al.  Transformative learning for computer science teachers: Examining how educators learn e-textiles in professional development , 2019, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[56]  Caitlin K. Martin,et al.  Digital Youth Divas: Exploring Narrative-Driven Curriculum to Spark Middle School Girls’ Interest in Computational Activities , 2017 .

[57]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Everyday creativity in novice e-textile designs , 2011, C&C '11.

[58]  Konstantinos Chorianopoulos,et al.  Teaching Programming in Secondary Education Through Embodied Computing Platforms , 2017, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[59]  Benedict du Boulay Programming Environments for Novices , 1992, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[60]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  What is computing?: bridging the gap between teenagers' perceptions and graduate students' experiences , 2007, ICER '07.

[61]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  WearAir: expressive t-shirts for air quality sensing , 2010, TEI '10.

[62]  Jeannette M. Wing An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[63]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles , 2013, IDC.

[64]  Paulo Blikstein Computationally Enhanced Toolkits for Children: Historical Review and a Framework for Future Design , 2015, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[65]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Electronic Textiles as Disruptive Designs: Supporting and Challenging Maker Activities in Schools , 2014 .

[66]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design , 2013 .

[67]  Heidi Schelhowe,et al.  EduWear: smart textiles as ways of relating computing technology to everyday life , 2009, IDC.

[68]  Bradley Barker,et al.  Utilizing Wearable Technologies as a Pathway to STEM , 2015 .

[69]  Jill Denner,et al.  Does Computer Game Design and Programming Benefit Children? A Meta-Synthesis of Research , 2019, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..