Structural mechanisms of selectivity and gating in anion channelrhodopsins

Both designed and natural anion-conducting channelrhodopsins (dACRs and nACRs, respectively) have been widely applied in optogenetics (enabling selective inhibition of target-cell activity during animal behaviour studies), but each class exhibits performance limitations, underscoring trade-offs in channel structure-function relationships. Therefore, molecular and structural insights into dACRs and nACRs will be critical not only for understanding the fundamental mechanisms of these light-gated anion channels, but also to create next-generation optogenetic tools. Here we report crystal structures of the dACR iC++, along with spectroscopic, electrophysiological and computational analyses that provide unexpected insights into pH dependence, substrate recognition, channel gating and ion selectivity of both dACRs and nACRs. These results enabled us to create an anion-conducting channelrhodopsin integrating the key features of large photocurrent and fast kinetics alongside exclusive anion selectivity.Crystal structures and molecular simulations of the designed anion-conducting channelrhodopsin iC++ provide molecular insights that enable structure-based design of channelrhodopsins with desirable properties for use as optogenetic tools.

[1]  Sergey L. Gratiy,et al.  Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity , 2017, Nature.

[2]  J. Spudich,et al.  Natural light-gated anion channels: A family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics , 2015, Science.

[3]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[4]  N. Pannu,et al.  REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[5]  Elena G. Govorunova,et al.  The Expanding Family of Natural Anion Channelrhodopsins Reveals Large Variations in Kinetics, Conductance, and Spectral Sensitivity , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  D. Case,et al.  Revised AMBER parameters for bioorganic phosphates. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[7]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Place field assembly distribution encodes preferred locations , 2017, PLoS biology.

[8]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Molecular Dynamics of Channelrhodopsin at the Early Stages of Channel Opening , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Hideki Kandori,et al.  Crystal structure of the natural anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1 , 2018, Nature.

[11]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  Jing Huang,et al.  CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Modulation of prefrontal cortex excitation/inhibition balance rescues social behavior in CNTNAP2-deficient mice , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[15]  Adam Santoro,et al.  Structural foundations of optogenetics: Determinants of channelrhodopsin ion selectivity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Satoshi P. Tsunoda,et al.  Conversion of Channelrhodopsin into a Light-Gated Chloride Channel , 2014, Science.

[17]  William E. Allen,et al.  Thirst-associated preoptic neurons encode an aversive motivational drive , 2017, Science.

[18]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction , 2011, Nature.

[19]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins , 2016, Nature Methods.

[20]  Massimo Scanziani,et al.  An improved chloride-conducting channelrhodopsin for light-induced inhibition of neuronal activity in vivo , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[21]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[22]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry , 2007, Nature.

[23]  K. Hirata,et al.  KAMO: towards automated data processing for microcrystals , 2018, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[24]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  The form and function of channelrhodopsin , 2017, Science.

[25]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Ultrafast optogenetic control , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Daniel R Roe,et al.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  J Hermans,et al.  Hydrophilicity of cavities in proteins , 1996, Proteins.

[28]  S. Rick,et al.  Atomistic Study of Intramolecular Interactions in the Closed-State Channelrhodopsin Chimera, C1C2. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Structure-Guided Transformation of Channelrhodopsin into a Light-Activated Chloride Channel , 2014, Science.

[31]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Long-Time-Step Molecular Dynamics through Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[33]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[35]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Inclusion of many-body effects in the additive CHARMM protein CMAP potential results in enhanced cooperativity of α-helix and β-hairpin formation. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[37]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Approaches for Diversifying and Extending Optogenetics , 2010, Cell.

[38]  Hideaki E. Kato,et al.  Crystal structure of the channelrhodopsin light-gated cation channel , 2012, Nature.

[39]  K. Deisseroth.  Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  S. Feller,et al.  Retinal conformation governs pKa of protonated Schiff base in rhodopsin activation. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Andrei L. Lomize,et al.  OPM: Orientations of Proteins in Membranes database , 2006, Bioinform..

[42]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[43]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Identification of Preoptic Sleep Neurons Using Retrograde Labeling and Gene Profiling , 2017, Nature.

[44]  J. Spudich,et al.  Photochemical reaction cycle transitions during anion channelrhodopsin gating , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .