A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance

The upright body in quiet stance is usually modeled as a single-link inverted pendulum. This agrees with most of the relevant sensory organs being at the far end of the pendulum, i.e., the eyes and the vestibular system in the head. Movement of the body in quiet stance has often been explained in terms of the “ankle strategy,” where most movement is generated by the ankle musculature, while more proximal muscle groups are only rarely activated for faster movements or in response to perturbations, for instance, by flexing at the hips in what has been called the “hip strategy.” Recent empirical evidence, however, shows that instead of being negligible in quiet stance, the movement in the knee and hip joints is even larger on average than the movement in the ankle joints (J Neurophysiol 97:3024-3035, 2007). Moreover, there is a strong pattern of covariation between movements in the ankle, knee and hip joints in a way that most of the observed movements leave the anterior–posterior position of the whole-body center of mass (CoM) invariant, i.e., only change the configuration of the different body parts around the CoM, instead of moving the body as a whole. It is unknown, however, where this covariation between joint angles during quiet stance originates from. In this paper, we aim to answer this question using a comprehensive model of the biomechanical, muscular and neural dynamics of a quietly standing human. We explore four different possible feedback laws for the control of this multi-link pendulum in upright stance that map sensory data to motor commands. We perform simulation studies to compare the generated inter-joint covariance patterns with experimental data. We find that control laws that actively coordinate muscle activation between the different joints generate correct variance patterns, while control laws that control each joint separately do not. Different specific forms of this coordination are compatible with the data.

[1]  F E Zajac,et al.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[2]  Young-Hui Chang,et al.  Rate-dependent control strategies stabilize limb forces during human locomotion , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  M. Latash Control of human movement , 1993 .

[4]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Human balancing of an inverted pendulum with a compliant linkage: neural control by anticipatory intermittent bias , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Redundancy, Self-Motion, and Motor Control , 2009, Neural Computation.

[6]  Laura H. Smallwood,et al.  Are Current Measurements of Lower Extremity Muscle Architecture Accurate? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  A. Kuo An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Michael Günther,et al.  Watching quiet human stance to shake off its straitjacket , 2011 .

[9]  Julius Verrel Distributional properties and variance-stabilizing transformations for measures of uncontrolled manifold effects , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Michael Günther,et al.  All leg joints contribute to quiet human stance: a mechanical analysis. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Sakia The Box-Cox transformation technique: a review , 1992 .

[12]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[14]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Multisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Jeroen B J Smeets,et al.  Relative damping improves linear mass-spring models of goal-directed movements. , 2002, Human movement science.

[16]  G. Schöner,et al.  Analyzing variance in multi-degree-of-freedom movements: uncovering structure versus extracting correlations. , 2007, Motor control.

[17]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  F. Zajac,et al.  Determining Muscle's Force and Action in Multi‐Articular Movement , 1989, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[19]  T. Kiemel,et al.  Visual Flow Is Interpreted Relative to Multisegment Postural Control , 2011, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  A randomization method for the calculation of covariation in multiple nonlinear relations: illustrated with the example of goal-directed movements , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Anatol G Feldman,et al.  Space and time in the context of equilibrium-point theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[22]  T. Mergner,et al.  Multisensory control of human upright stance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Michael Günther,et al.  Phase synchronisation of the three leg joints in quiet human stance. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[24]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators: A tutorial , 1990, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[25]  D. Wolpert Computational approaches to motor control , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Ilona J Pinter,et al.  The dynamics of postural sway cannot be captured using a one-segment inverted pendulum model: a PCA on segment rotations during unperturbed stance. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  David A. Winter,et al.  Human balance and posture control during standing and walking , 1995 .

[28]  Graham E. Caldwell,et al.  Contractile and Elastic Ankle Joint Muscular Properties in Young and Older Adults , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Peterka,et al.  A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  L. Ting,et al.  Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Loeb,et al.  Spinal-Like Regulator Facilitates Control of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Wrist , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Philippe Micheau,et al.  Evaluation of the lambda model for human postural control during ankle strategy , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  A multisensory integration model of human stance control , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  David J. Ostry,et al.  The control of multi-muscle systems: human jaw and hyoid movements , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Springer Handbook of Robotics , 2007, Springer Handbooks.

[38]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Optimal isn’t good enough , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  Kimitaka Nakazawa,et al.  Interjoint Dynamic Interaction during Constrained Human Quiet Standing Examined by Induced Acceleration Analysis Torque at One Joint Induces Angular Acceleration Not Only at Its Corresponding Dof but Also at Remote Joints. Such Dynamic Interaction among Joints Has , 2022 .

[40]  P. Gatev,et al.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Laura Sacerdote,et al.  The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck neuronal model with signal-dependent noise , 2001 .

[43]  D J Ostry,et al.  Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[45]  T. Kiemel,et al.  Identification of the plant for upright stance in humans: multiple movement patterns from a single neural strategy. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Leonard A. Rozendaal,et al.  Stability of bipedal stance: the contribution of cocontraction and spindle feedback , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[49]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Control and estimation of posture during quiet stance depends on multijoint coordination. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  A unified view of quiet and perturbed stance: simultaneous co-existing excitable modes , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  P. Morasso,et al.  Can muscle stiffness alone stabilize upright standing? , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[54]  Julius Verrel A formal and data-based comparison of measures of motor-equivalent covariation , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  T. Milner,et al.  Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  R. Riener,et al.  Identification of passive elastic joint moments in the lower extremities. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  S. Park,et al.  Feedback equilibrium control during human standing , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[58]  L A Rozendaal,et al.  Stabilization of a multi-segment model of bipedal standing by local joint control overestimates the required ankle stiffness. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[59]  L. Ricciardi,et al.  The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model for neuronal activity , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[60]  G. Schöner,et al.  Motor equivalent control of the center of mass in response to support surface perturbations , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  Philip L. Smith From Poisson shot noise to the integrated Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process: Neurally principled models of information accumulation in decision-making and response time , 2010 .