Cortical Action Potential Backpropagation Explains Spike Threshold Variability and Rapid-Onset Kinetics

Neocortical action potential responses in vivo are characterized by considerable threshold variability, and thus timing and rate variability, even under seemingly identical conditions. This finding suggests that cortical ensembles are required for accurate sensorimotor integration and processing. Intracellularly, trial-to-trial variability results not only from variation in synaptic activities, but also in the transformation of these into patterns of action potentials. Through simultaneous axonal and somatic recordings and computational simulations, we demonstrate that the initiation of action potentials in the axon initial segment followed by backpropagation of these spikes throughout the neuron results in a distortion of the relationship between the timing of synaptic and action potential events. In addition, this backpropagation also results in an unusually high rate of rise of membrane potential at the foot of the action potential. The distortion of the relationship between the amplitude time course of synaptic inputs and action potential output caused by spike backpropagation results in the appearance of high spike threshold variability at the level of the soma. At the point of spike initiation, the axon initial segment, threshold variability is considerably less. Our results indicate that spike generation in cortical neurons is largely as expected by Hodgkin–Huxley theory and is more precise than previously thought.

[1]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Eccles,et al.  The generation of impulses in motoneurones , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  W. Catterall,et al.  Localization of sodium channels in axon hillocks and initial segments of retinal ganglion cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Waxman,et al.  Ion channel organization of the myelinated fiber , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  D. McCormick,et al.  A model of the electrophysiological properties of thalamocortical relay neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Neher Correction for liquid junction potentials in patch clamp experiments. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  J. M. Ritchie,et al.  Molecular dissection of the myelinated axon , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[9]  S. Waxman Voltage-gated ion channels in axons: Localization, function, and development , 1995 .

[10]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A model of spike initiation in neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1995, Neuron.

[11]  E. Azmitia,et al.  Cellular Localization of the 5-HT1A Receptor in Primate Brain Neurons and Glial Cells , 1996, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[12]  D. Johnston,et al.  Axonal Action-Potential Initiation and Na+ Channel Densities in the Soma and Axon Initial Segment of Subicular Pyramidal Neurons , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1996, Nature.

[14]  D. Johnston,et al.  K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons , 1997, Nature.

[15]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Influence of low and high frequency inputs on spike timing in visual cortical neurons. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  N. Spruston,et al.  Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian CNS , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Action potential initiation and propagation in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  The NEURON Simulation Environment , 1997, Neural Computation.

[19]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Impact of spontaneous synaptic activity on the resting properties of cat neocortical pyramidal neurons In vivo. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Miles,et al.  Cell‐attached measurements of the firing threshold of rat hippocampal neurones , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Ferster,et al.  The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. , 2000, Science.

[23]  C. Gray,et al.  Dynamic spike threshold reveals a mechanism for synaptic coincidence detection in cortical neurons in vivo. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons , 2001, Neuroscience.

[25]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Action potential threshold of hippocampal pyramidal cells in vivo is increased by recent spiking activity , 2001, Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Komada,et al.  βIV-spectrin regulates sodium channel clustering through ankyrin-G at axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  C. Colbert,et al.  Ion channel properties underlying axonal action potential initiation in pyramidal neurons , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  D. Johnston,et al.  Pharmacological upregulation of h-channels reduces the excitability of pyramidal neuron dendrites , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Andrea Hasenstaub,et al.  Barrages of Synaptic Activity Control the Gain and Sensitivity of Cortical Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Gray,et al.  Adaptive Coincidence Detection and Dynamic Gain Control in Visual Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 2003, Neuron.

[31]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Michele Migliore,et al.  Role of an A-Type K+ Conductance in the Back-Propagation of Action Potentials in the Dendrites of Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Contreras,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Changes in Spike Threshold Enhance Feature Selectivity in Rat Barrel Cortex Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  G. Tamás,et al.  Lighting the chandelier: new vistas for axo-axonic cells , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  Michael Rudolph,et al.  Characterization of synaptic conductances and integrative properties during electrically induced EEG-activated states in neocortical neurons in vivo. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  G. Stuart,et al.  Site of Action Potential Initiation in Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. DeFelipe,et al.  Voltage-gated ion channels in the axon initial segment of human cortical pyramidal cells and their relationship with chandelier cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  D. McCormick,et al.  Modulation of intracortical synaptic potentials by presynaptic somatic membrane potential , 2006, Nature.

[39]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Neuroscience: Spikes too kinky in the cortex? , 2006, Nature.

[40]  M. Volgushev,et al.  Unique features of action potential initiation in cortical neurons , 2006, Nature.

[41]  M. Gutnick,et al.  Persistent Sodium Current in Layer 5 Neocortical Neurons Is Primarily Generated in the Proximal Axon , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Johannes J. Letzkus,et al.  Axon Initial Segment Kv1 Channels Control Axonal Action Potential Waveform and Synaptic Efficacy , 2007, Neuron.

[43]  D. McCormick,et al.  Selective control of cortical axonal spikes by a slowly inactivating K+ current , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  D. McCormick,et al.  Neurophysiology: Hodgkin and Huxley model — still standing? , 2007, Nature.

[45]  Yuguo Yu,et al.  Properties of action-potential initiation in neocortical pyramidal cells: evidence from whole cell axon recordings. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  B. Kampa,et al.  Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.