An Ontology-Based Framework for Bridging Learning Design and Learning Content

The paper describes an ontology-based framework for bridging learning design and learning object content. In present solutions, researchers have proposed conceptual models and developed tools for both of those subjects, but without detailed discussions of how they can be used together. In this paper we advocate the use of ontologies to explicitly specify all learning designs, learning objects, and the relations between them, and show how this use of ontologies can result in more effective (semi-)automatic tools and services that increase the level of reusability. We first define a three-part conceptual model that introduces an intermediate level between learning design and learning objects called the learning object context. We then use ontologies to facilitate the representation of these concepts: LOCO is a new ontology based on IMS-LD, ALOCoM is an existing ontology for learning objects, and LOCO-Cite is a new ontology for the learning object contextual model. We conclude by showing the applicability of the proposed framework in a use case study.

[1]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[2]  Michael Priestley DITA XML: a reuse by reference architecture for technical documentation , 2001, SIGDOC '01.

[3]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[4]  Rudi Studer,et al.  An Approach for the Ranking of Query Results in the Semantic Web , 2003, SEMWEB.

[5]  Carsten Ullrich,et al.  The Learning-Resource-Type is Dead, Long Live the Learning-Resource-Type! , 2005 .

[6]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Agents and the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[7]  Pierre Gorissen Alfanet Worked Example: What is Greatness? , 2004 .

[8]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Linking learning object repositories , 2005, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[9]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Towards a Global Component Architecture for Learning Objects: A Slide Presentation Framework , 2005 .

[10]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[11]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  Preface to Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training , 2005 .

[12]  Erik Duval,et al.  Ontology of Learning Object Content Structure , 2005, AIED.

[13]  Rob Koper An Introduction to Learning Design , 2005 .

[14]  Griff Richards Designing Educational Games , 2005 .

[15]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[16]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[17]  M. G. Panteleyev,et al.  Intelligent educational environments based on the semantic Web technologies , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICAIS 2002).

[18]  Simon Fraser,et al.  INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORIES , 2003 .

[19]  Erik Duval,et al.  Towards a Global Component Architecture for Learning Objects: An Ontology Based Approach , 2004, OTM Workshops.

[20]  Anton Naumenko,et al.  General Adaption Framework , 2005, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[21]  Holger Knublauch,et al.  The Protégé OWL Plugin: An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications , 2004, SEMWEB.

[22]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  Educational modelling language and learning design: new opportunities for instructional reusability and personalised learning , 2004, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[23]  James Dalziel,et al.  Implementing learning design : the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) , 2003 .

[24]  M. Felisa Verdejo,et al.  Modeling Educational Content: The Cognitive Approach of the PALO Language , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[26]  M. Sicilia Ontology-Based Competency Management: Infrastructures for the Knowledge Intensive Learning Organization , 2005 .

[27]  Tom Carey,et al.  Learning Design Repositories:Adapting Learning Design Specifications For Shared Instructional Knowledge , 2004 .

[28]  Griff Richards Editorial: The Challenges of the Learning Object Paradigm , 2002 .

[29]  Tom Carey,et al.  Educational Rationale Metadata for Learning Objects , 2002 .

[30]  Rob Koper,et al.  Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML , 2001 .

[31]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Ontologies to integrate learning design and learning content , 2005 .

[32]  Colin Tattersall QTI and Learning Design , 2004 .

[33]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  TANGRAM: An Ontology-based Learning Environment for Intelligent Information Systems , 2005 .

[34]  Jerry Zhigang Li,et al.  Crossing Boundaries with Web-Based Tools for Learning Object Evaluation , 2004, ICWL.

[35]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[36]  Rob Koper,et al.  Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[37]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantics for the Semantic Web: The Implicit, the Formal and the Powerful , 2005, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[38]  Raghu Ramakrishnan,et al.  Database Management Systems , 1976 .