Toward risk aware mission planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Long range and high endurance Autonomous Underwater Vehicles such as gliders enable sustained oceanographic sampling at larger time-scales and much lower operational costs compared to traditional ship-based sampling methods. While most path-planning methods for AUVs optimize paths with respect to efficiency, obstacle avoidance, and control they do not explicitly address the issue of finding the safest possible path when considering risks such as shipping traffic and bathymetry. In coastal regions with high shipping traffic, reducing collision risk at the path planning stage, at the expense of efficiency, is a worthwhile trade-off. We propose a method of building risk maps using historical data from the Automated Information System. These are used to plan minimum risk paths between a specified start and goal location, while avoiding obstacles, using an algorithm based on A* search. Our planner incorporates the uncertainty in dead-reckoning without explicitly considering the effect of ocean currents. We compare the relative risk of paths produced by our method when compared to a shortest-path planner which does not take risk into account, and show that our methods performs significantly better, while producing competitive paths lengths.

[1]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  A Comparative Study of Probabilistic Roadmap Planners , 2002, WAFR.

[2]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[3]  Matthew Dunbabin,et al.  Go with the flow : optimal AUV path planning in coastal environments , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[4]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  USC CINAPS Builds bridges : observing and monitoring the southern california bight , 2010 .

[5]  Giorgio Guglieri,et al.  A Minimum Risk Approach for Path Planning of UAVs , 2011, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[6]  Oscar Schofield,et al.  Growing a Distributed Ocean Observatory: Our View from the COOL Room , 2009 .

[7]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Towards the Improvement of Autonomous Glider Navigational Accuracy Through the use of Regional Ocean Models , 2010 .

[8]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  USC CINAPS Builds Bridges , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Er. Waghoo Parvez,et al.  Path planning in construction sites : performance evaluation of the Dijkstra , A * , and GA search algorithms , 2013 .

[10]  Oscar Schofield,et al.  Slocum Gliders: Robust and ready , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  E. L. Nelson,et al.  AUV path planning: an A* approach to path planning with consideration of variable vehicle speeds and multiple, overlapping, time-dependent exclusion zones , 1992, Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology.

[12]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Informative path planning for an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Hissam Tawfik,et al.  Path planning in construction sites: performance evaluation of the Dijkstra, A*, and GA search algorithms , 2002, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[14]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Rustam Stolkin,et al.  Optimal AUV path planning for extended missions in complex, fast-flowing estuarine environments , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Ryan N. Smith,et al.  Observing and Monitoring the Southern California Bight , 2010 .

[17]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[18]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Simultaneous Tracking and Sampling of Dynamic Oceanographic Features with Autonomous Underwater Vehicles and Lagrangian Drifters , 2010, ISER.