Multiple vehicle driving control for traffic flow efficiency

The dynamics of multi-agent in nature have been largely studied for a long time to investigate how the aggregation of agents can move smoothly in complex environments without collision. The main insights can be summarized such that the aggregated dynamics of animals and particles can be explained by an individual's simple rules. In a similar vein, we conjecture that such simple rules for vehicle maneuvering can accommodate the fluid flow of traffic and reduce car accidents in highway and urban areas. In this paper, we first show the Reynolds' three rules are applicable to autonomous driving on a single lane. Moreover, we provide additional requirements and algorithms for multiple lanes. Based on these results, we show that the proposed nature-inspired driving maneuver can increase traffic flow by 1) mitigating shockwave at bottlenecks and 2) extending the perception range for better path planning, which requires the support of the vehicle autonomy and wireless communication, respectively. Finally, we prove the feasibility of our work with experiments using multiple UAVs.

[1]  D. de Bruin,et al.  Design and test of a cooperative adaptive cruise control system , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.

[2]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games , 2000 .

[3]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  T. Ogawa,et al.  Lane Recognition Using On-vehicle LIDAR , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[6]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Traffic jams without bottlenecks—experimental evidence for the physical mechanism of the formation of a jam , 2008 .

[7]  José Eugenio Naranjo,et al.  Lane-Change Fuzzy Control in Autonomous Vehicles for the Overtaking Maneuver , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control , 2001 .

[10]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Assessment of safety levels and an innovative design for the Lane Change Assistant , 2010, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[11]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Modeling Effects of Driver Control Assistance Systems on Traffic , 2001 .

[12]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Jin Li-sheng,et al.  Research on safety lane change model of driver assistant system on highway , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[14]  Wei-Bin Zhang,et al.  Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[15]  Petros A. Ioannou Guest editorial adaptive cruise control systems special issue , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[16]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  Vision-based ACC with a single camera: bounds on range and range rate accuracy , 2003, IEEE IV2003 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8683).

[17]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Video-based lane estimation and tracking for driver assistance: survey, system, and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Lane-changing in traffic streams , 2006 .