Managing complex projects and systems: a literature synthesis

ABSTRACT This paper provides a comprehensive synthesis of the seminal literature in complex systems to identify a group of key complex systems parameters and models relevant to both systems engineering and construction project management. The key research question addressed is whether the traditional practice of engineering, particularly as applied to project management and systems engineering projects, would benefit from recognising the large body of work of complex adaptive systems. A conceptual framework, which applies to both complex construction projects and systems engineering projects is presented to assist your system engineers and project managers in dealing with project complexity. Adaptivity is required in complex projects and this responsibility needs to be at the enterprise level of programs and portfolios. Complex adaptive systems models such as Ashby’s law of requisite variety, fractals and Power Laws, emergence, self-organisation and dynamic systems could benefit project based enterprises and system engineers. A group of complex systems tools, which are often neglected, such as mindfulness, preoccupation with failure, normalising deviance and humility are highlighted. A group of non-functional requirements for systems engineering projects is also proposed.

[1]  Richard N. Knowles,et al.  Self-Organizing Leadership: A Way of Seeing What Is Happening in Organizations and a Pathway to Coherence (Part II) , 2001 .

[2]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Connectivity, Extremes, and Adaptation: A Power-Law Perspective of Organizational Effectiveness , 2011 .

[3]  Per Bak Simulation of Self-organized Criticality , 1990 .

[4]  Colin Duffield,et al.  Enhancing Trust-Based Interface Management in International Engineering-Procurement-Construction Projects , 2017 .

[5]  John Brocklesby,et al.  Designing a Viable Organization Structure , 1996 .

[6]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Experiments with a Heuristic Compiler , 1963, JACM.

[7]  Stephen Harwood,et al.  The Changing Structural Dynamics of the Scottish Tourism Industry Examined Using Stafford Beer’s VSM , 2009 .

[8]  C. Eden,et al.  Strategic management of stakeholders : theory and practice , 2011 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[10]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  A computational model , 2014 .

[11]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Globally networked risks and how to respond , 2013, Nature.

[12]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Complex system governance reference model , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[13]  Pg Wright,et al.  Mega transport projects—Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Findings from the OMEGA research programme , 2013 .

[14]  Markus Schwaninger,et al.  Organizing for sustainability: a cybernetic concept for sustainable renewal , 2015, Kybernetes.

[15]  Carl T. Haas,et al.  Interface-Management Process for Managing Risks in Complex Capital Projects , 2016 .

[16]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Norman J Beauchamp,et al.  Scenario planning. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[18]  Richard J. Heaslip Managing Complex Projects and Programs: HEASLIP: MANAGING COMPLEX PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS , 2014 .

[19]  B. McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era ! , 2007 .

[20]  Akira Omoto The accident at TEPCO's Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: What went wrong and what lessons are universal? , 2013 .

[21]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  Developing a city-level multi-project management information system for Chinese urbanization , 2015 .

[22]  P. R. Laughlin Social choice theory, social decision scheme theory, and group decision-making , 2011 .

[23]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Edward Ochieng,et al.  Managing Cross-Cultural Communication in Multicultural Construction Project Teams: The Case of Kenya and UK , 2010 .

[25]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Systems Engineering and Complex Systems Governance – Lessons for Better Integration , 2019 .

[26]  Eric S. Rebentisch,et al.  Integrating Program Management and Systems Engineering: Processes, Tools and Organizational Systems for Improving Performance , 2017 .

[27]  J. Owsinski,et al.  Is There Any ‘Law of Requisite Variety’ in Construction of Indices for Complex Systems? , 2018 .

[28]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[29]  Michael T. Pich,et al.  Managing project uncertainty: from variation to chaos , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[30]  S. Carapiet,et al.  Role of self-organisation in facilitating adaptive organisation: a proposed index for the ability to self-organise , 2007 .

[31]  Tom Ritchey,et al.  Wicked Problems – Social Messes , 2011 .

[32]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research , 2002 .

[33]  Fouzi M. Ben-Ali Structural design of a national youth and sports information system using the viable system model , 2011, Kybernetes.

[34]  Hermann Haken,et al.  What Can Synergetics Contribute to Embodied Aesthetics? , 2017, Behavioral sciences.

[35]  Polinpapilinho F. Katina Systems theory-based construct for identifying metasystem pathologies for complex system governance , 2015 .