Maintaining Communication Link for a Robot Operating in a Hazardous Environment

Abstract : Communication is usually the limiting factor governing human-robot interaction during teleoperated operation in nuclear storage facilities. Thick concrete shielding makes it extremely difficult to maintain high- bandwidth radio communication. The same problem is encountered in urban law-enforcement applications and in hostile military operations. Hard cable tethers are cumbersome, require large spools for extended range, and are not appropriate for most applications besides urban explosive-ordnance-disposal. Thinner optical fibers, even reinforced, have been found to be fragile in field use in the Afghanistan and Iraq theaters. The cables often get run over by the robot as it is maneuvered around obstacles. Snagging and stretching of the fiber around corners often cause signal loss. These problems may be mitigated if the robot can assume some of the lower-level functions, such as obstacle avoidance and local path planning. This would reduce the amount of data traffic, and allow for the use of lower-frequency, lower-bandwidth radio links that have better wall penetrating capability. However, we have found that in critical missions, the soldier/operators preferred complete control of every aspect of the robot, minimizing any chance for surprises. Thus a high-bandwidth (video rate) communication link is required.

[1]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  A Probabilistic On-Line Mapping Algorithm for Teams of Mobile Robots , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Issues in Vehicle Teleoperation for Tunnel and Sewer Reconnaissance , 2000 .

[3]  Dieter Fox,et al.  KLD-Sampling: Adaptive Particle Filters , 2001, NIPS.

[4]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  An Advanced Telereflexive Tactical Response Robot , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Kurt Konolige,et al.  Incremental mapping of large cyclic environments , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. CIRA'99 (Cat. No.99EX375).

[6]  Iwan Ulrich,et al.  VFH+: reliable obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[7]  Douglas W. Gage,et al.  A technique for coordinating autonomous robots , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Richard T. Vaughan,et al.  The Player/Stage Project: Tools for Multi-Robot and Distributed Sensor Systems , 2003 .

[9]  B. Welsh,et al.  Energy-conservation for tactical robot networks , 1999, MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341).

[10]  Alan C. Schultz,et al.  Mobile robot exploration and map-building with continuous localization , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[11]  D.A. Few,et al.  Intelligent autonomy for remote characterization of hazardous environments , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[12]  Cang Ye,et al.  Characterization of a 2D laser scanner for mobile robot obstacle negotiation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[13]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Sensors for Mobile Robots: Theory and Application , 1995 .

[14]  Hoa G. Nguyen,et al.  Robotics for law enforcement: applications beyond explosive ordnance disposal , 2001, SPIE Optics East.

[15]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Localization for mobile robot teams using maximum likelihood estimation , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Hoa G. Nguyen,et al.  Autonomous Communication Relays for Tactical Robots , 2003 .