Tracking objects that move where they are headed

Previous work has demonstrated that the ability to keep track of moving objects is improved when the objects have unique visual features, such as color or shape. In the present study, we investigated how orientation information is used during the tracking of objects. Orientation is an interesting feature to explore in moving objects because it is directional and is often informative of the direction of motion. Most objects move forward, in the direction they are oriented. In the present experiments, participants tracked a subset of moving isosceles triangles whose orientations were constant, related, or unrelated to the direction of motion. In the standard multiple object tracking (MOT) task, tracking performance improved when orientations were unique and remained constant, but not when orientation and direction of motion were aligned. In the target recovery task, in which MOT was interrupted by a brief blanking of the display, performance did improve when orientation and direction were aligned. In the final experiment, results showed that orientation was not used before the blank to predict future target locations, but was instead used after the blank. We concluded that people use orientation to compare a stored representation to target position for recovery of lost targets.

[1]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Attentional selection of moving objects by a serial process , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  Roy R. Behrens,et al.  The Role of Artists in Ship Camouflage During World War I , 1999, Leonardo.

[3]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Explaining human multiple object tracking as resource-constrained approximate inference in a dynamic probabilistic model , 2009, NIPS.

[4]  Roman Borisyuk,et al.  An Oscillatory Neural Model of Multiple Object Tracking , 2006, Neural Computation.

[5]  Tal Makovski,et al.  The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  Derek P. Atherton,et al.  Tracking of Multiple Targets , 1990 .

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  J. Freyd,et al.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  James T Enns,et al.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Martin Stevens,et al.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[13]  J. Freyd,et al.  A velocity effect for representational momentum , 1985 .

[14]  K. Morikawa,et al.  Symmetry and elongation of objects influence perceived direction of translational motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Tracking unique objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Norman G. Vinson,et al.  Sources of object-specific effects in representational momentum , 2002 .

[17]  S. Palmer.  What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Camouflage and visual perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  D. Somers,et al.  Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[20]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher‐order cognition? An individual difference approach , 2004 .

[21]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Dazzle coloration and prey movement , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Perceptual Bias for Forward-Facing Motion , 1992 .

[24]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[26]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[28]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  T. Horowitz,et al.  The role of location and motion information in the tracking and recovery of moving objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Motion signal and the perceived positions of moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[32]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Metrics for the strength of low-level motion perception , 1990, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[33]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  Static patterns moving in the mind. , 1995 .

[34]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[35]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Markus Huff,et al.  Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking. , 2010, Journal of vision.