East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis

Abstract. We apply atmospheric methane column retrievals from two different satellite instruments (Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite – GOSAT; TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument – TROPOMI) to a regional inversion framework to quantify East Asian methane emissions for 2019 at 0.5∘ × 0.625∘ horizontal resolution. The goal is to assess if GOSAT (relatively mature but sparse) and TROPOMI (new and dense) observations inform consistent methane emissions from East Asia with identically configured inversions. Comparison of the results from the two inversions shows similar correction patterns to the prior inventory in central northern China, central southern China, northeastern China, and Bangladesh, with less than 2.6 Tg a−1 differences in regional posterior emissions. The two inversions, however, disagree over some important regions, particularly in northern India and eastern China. The methane emissions inferred from GOSAT observations are 7.7 Tg a−1 higher than those from TROPOMI observations over northern India but 6.4 Tg a−1 lower over eastern China. The discrepancies between the two inversions are robust against varied inversion configurations (i.e., assimilation window and error specifications). We find that the lower methane emissions from eastern China inferred by the GOSAT inversion are more consistent with independent ground-based in situ and total column (TCCON) observations, indicating that the TROPOMI retrievals may have high XCH4 biases in this region. We also evaluate inversion results against tropospheric aircraft observations over India during 2012–2014 by using a consistent GOSAT inversion of earlier years as an intercomparison platform. This indirect evaluation favors lower methane emissions from northern India inferred by the TROPOMI inversion. We find that in this case the discrepancy in emission inference is contributed by differences in data coverage (almost no observations by GOSAT vs. good spatial coverage by TROPOMI) over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. The two inversions also differ substantially in their posterior estimates for northwestern China and neighboring Kazakhstan, which is mainly due to seasonally varying biases between GOSAT and TROPOMI XCH4 data that correlate with changes in surface albedo.

[1]  J. Sheng,et al.  Observed changes in China’s methane emissions linked to policy drivers , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Sheng,et al.  Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  M. Sulprizio,et al.  Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  R. Gautam,et al.  Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  R. Parker,et al.  Tropical methane emissions explain large fraction of recent changes in global atmospheric methane growth rate , 2022, Nature communications.

[6]  J. Notholt,et al.  Long-term observations of atmospheric constituents at the first ground-based high-resolution fourier-transform spectrometry observation station in china , 2022, Engineering.

[7]  G. Balsamo,et al.  Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Decreasing methane emissions from China’s coal mining with rebounded coal production , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[9]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget , 2021, Global change biology.

[10]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Comparing national greenhouse gas budgets reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions , 2021, Earth System Science Data.

[11]  Jinfeng Chang,et al.  Recent Slowdown of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in China Driven by Stabilized Coal Production , 2021, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[12]  J. Sheng,et al.  Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[13]  J. Maasakkers,et al.  Supplementary material to "Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments" , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[14]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  Validation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[15]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements , 2021 .

[16]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  SRON S5P - RemoTeC scientific TROPOMI XCH4 dataset , 2021 .

[17]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations , 2020 .

[18]  J. Sheng,et al.  Sustained methane emissions from China after 2012 despite declining coal production and rice-cultivated area , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[19]  J. Sheng,et al.  Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[20]  J. Sheng,et al.  Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[21]  N. Kumps,et al.  New ground-based Fourier-transform near-infrared solar absorption measurements of XCO2, XCH4 and XCO at Xianghe, China , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[22]  P. Ciais,et al.  Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[23]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  A decade of GOSAT Proxy satellite CH4 observations , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[24]  M. Omara,et al.  Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space , 2020, Science Advances.

[25]  R. Jackson,et al.  Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement , 2019, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[26]  J. Sheng,et al.  A global gridded (0.1° × 0.1°) inventory of methane emissions from oil, gas, and coal exploitation based on national reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[27]  Kei Shiomi,et al.  A scientific algorithm to simultaneously retrieve carbon monoxide and methane from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[28]  J. Sheng,et al.  Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[29]  H. Schaefer,et al.  Rising methane: A new climate challenge , 2019, Science.

[30]  J. Sheng,et al.  Bottom-Up Estimates of Coal Mine Methane Emissions in China: A Gridded Inventory, Emission Factors, and Trends , 2019, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[31]  S. Michel,et al.  Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement , 2019, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[32]  Haeyoung Lee,et al.  The measurement of atmospheric CO2 at KMA GAW regional stations, its characteristics, and comparisons with other East Asian sites , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[33]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  China’s coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[34]  J. Sheng,et al.  Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[35]  Haili Hu,et al.  Toward Global Mapping of Methane With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersatellite Comparison to GOSAT , 2018 .

[36]  R. Parker,et al.  Atmospheric observations show accurate reporting and little growth in India’s methane emissions , 2017, Nature Communications.

[37]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012 , 2017, Earth System Science Data.

[38]  Bin Zhao,et al.  The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). , 2017, Journal of climate.

[39]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry , 2017 .

[40]  D. Jacob,et al.  A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0) , 2017 .

[41]  F. Murguia-Flores,et al.  Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil , 2017, Geoscientific Model Development.

[42]  J. Sheng,et al.  Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions , 2016 .

[43]  Haili Hu,et al.  The operational methane retrieval algorithm for TROPOMI , 2016 .

[44]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[45]  Henry Buijs,et al.  Update on GOSAT TANSO-FTS performance, operations, and data products after more than 6 years in space , 2016 .

[46]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Inverse modeling of GOSAT-retrieved ratios of total column CH4 and CO2 for 2009 and 2010 , 2016 .

[47]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH 4 data and associated uncertainties , 2015 .

[48]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models , 2015 .

[49]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data , 2015 .

[50]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Mapping of North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data , 2014 .

[51]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Inverse modelling of CH 4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY , 2014 .

[52]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations , 2013 .

[53]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Improvement of the retrieval algorithm for GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 and their validation using TCCON data , 2013 .

[54]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  On the consistency between global and regional methane emissions inferred from SCIAMACHY, TANSO-FTS, IASI and surface measurements , 2013 .

[55]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Methane retrievals from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) shortwave infrared measurements: Performance comparison of proxy and physics retrieval algorithms , 2012 .

[56]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[57]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space , 2011 .

[58]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Toward accurate CO_2 and CH_4 observations from GOSAT , 2011 .

[59]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT , 2011 .

[60]  E. Dlugokencky,et al.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[61]  D. Jacob,et al.  Intercomparison methods for satellite measurements of atmospheric composition: application to tropospheric ozone from TES and OMI , 2010 .

[62]  Masakatsu Nakajima,et al.  Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. , 2009, Applied optics.

[63]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Renewed growth of atmospheric methane , 2008 .

[64]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: Analysis of the years 2003 and 2004 , 2006 .

[65]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  Assessing Methane Emissions from Global Space-Borne Observations , 2005, Science.

[66]  John C. Gille,et al.  Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide , 2004 .

[67]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[68]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[69]  Edward J. Dlugokencky,et al.  The growth rate and distribution of atmospheric methane , 1994 .

[70]  J. Lerner,et al.  Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle , 1991 .

[71]  J. Sheng,et al.  Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 , 2019 .

[72]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  EDGAR v 4 . 3 . 2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970 – 2012 , 2017 .

[73]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results , 2009 .

[74]  P. Hansen.  Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion , 1987 .