Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a haptic augmented simulation in learning physics. The results indicate that haptic augmented simulations, both the force and kinesthetic and the purely kinesthetic simulations, were more effective than the equivalent non-haptic simulation in providing perceptual experiences and helping elementary students create multimodal representations of the movements of gears. However, in most cases, force feedback was needed to construct a fully loaded multimodal representation that helps students to comprehend later instruction with less sensory modalities. In addition, the force and kinesthetic simulation was effective in helping to transfer knowledge to new learning situations. These findings suggest that it is important to help elementary students make a solid cognitive grounding with the use of a perceptual anchor.

[1]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Mental Models in Expert Physics Reasoning , 1987 .

[2]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children's numerical development. , 2008, Developmental science.

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  The evolution of a cognitive psychologist: a journey from simple behaviors to complex mental acts. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Thomas R. Tretter,et al.  Haptic Augmentation of Science Instruction: Does Touch Matter? , 2006 .

[5]  G. Lakoff.  Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[6]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Haptics-Augmented Simple-Machine Educational Tools , 2003 .

[7]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language , 1980, Shaping Entrepreneurship Research.

[8]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  David Klahr,et al.  Point and Click or Build by Hand: Comparing the Effects of Physical vs. Virtual Materials on Middle School Students' Ability to Optimize an Engineering Design - eScholarship , 2005 .

[10]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension. , 2004 .

[11]  R. Gibbs.  Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[12]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Shuttling Between Depictive Models and Abstract Rules: Induction and Fallback , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  John B. Black,et al.  Direct-manipulation animation: incorporating the haptic channel in the learning process to support middle school students in science learning and mental model acquisition , 2006 .

[14]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .

[15]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Conceptual Construction of Fields Through Tactile Interface , 1999, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students' Ability to Design Experiments , 2003 .

[17]  Michael Gasser,et al.  The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies , 2005, Artificial Life.

[18]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. , 1999 .

[19]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. , 2008, Child development.

[20]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Embodied experience and linguistic meaning , 2003, Brain and Language.

[21]  E. Gentaz,et al.  The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children's understanding of the alphabetic principle , 2004 .

[22]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[24]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  Haptics in virtual environments: taxonomy, research status, and challenges , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[25]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[26]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Project GROPE-HapticDisplays for Scientific Visualization , 1990 .

[28]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Haptics in Education: Exploring an Untapped Sensory Modality , 2006 .

[29]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Haptics-Augmented Engineering Mechanics Educational Tools , 2007 .

[30]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[31]  J. B. Black.  An Embodied/Grounded Cognition Perspective on Educational Technology , 2010 .

[32]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Alexander Rettig,et al.  The virtual touch: Haptic interfaces in virtual environments , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[35]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[36]  Jeremy Roschelle.  MicroAnalysis of Qualitative Physics: Opening the Black Box. , 1991 .