Variable stiffness Mckibben muscles with hydraulic and pneumatic operating modes

Abstract McKibben muscles have been shown to have improved stiffness characteristics when operating hydraulically. However when operating pneumatically, they are compliant and so have potential for safer physical human–robot interaction. This paper presents a method for rapidly switching between pneumatic and hydraulic modes of operation without the need to remove all hydraulic fluid from the actuator. A compliant and potentially safe pneumatic mode is demonstrated and compared with a much stiffer hydraulic mode. The paper also explores a combined pneumatic/hydraulic mode of operation which allows both the position of the joint and the speed at which it reacts to a disturbance force to be controlled.

[1]  Michael A Meller,et al.  Hydraulic artificial muscles , 2012 .

[2]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Toward Variable Recruitment Fluidic Artificial Muscles , 2013 .

[3]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Control of pneumatic muscle actuators , 1995 .

[4]  T. Tjahjowidodo,et al.  A New Approach to Modeling Hysteresis in a Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Using The Maxwell-Slip Model , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  R. Bradbeer,et al.  Exploration for novel uses of air muscles as hydraulic muscles for underwater actuator , 2008, OCEANS 2008 - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean.

[6]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Fatigue characteristics of McKibben artificial muscle actuators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[7]  Jian Huang,et al.  Fuzzy PID control of a wearable rehabilitation robotic hand driven by pneumatic muscles , 2009, 2009 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science.

[8]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Water/air performance analysis of a fluidic muscle , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  The Safety of a Robot Actuated by Pneumatic Muscles—A Case Study , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Michael Philen.  Tunable Modulus Structures utilizing Fluidic Flexible Matrix Composites: Analytical and Experimental Investigations , 2010 .

[11]  T.-J. Yeh,et al.  Control of McKibben pneumatic muscles for a power-assist, lower-limb orthosis , 2010 .

[12]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[13]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Improved modelling and assessment of pneumatic muscle actuators , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[14]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Enhanced Modelling and Performance in Braided Pneumatic Muscle Actuators , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Efficiency testing of hydraulic artificial muscles with variable recruitment using a linear dynamometer , 2015, Smart Structures.

[16]  Daniel A. Kingsley,et al.  A Cockroach Inspired Robot With Artificial Muscles , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Tae-Yong Choi,et al.  Enhanced manipulator's safety with artificial pneumatic muscle , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Very High Force Hydraulic McKibben Artificial Muscle with a p-Phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole Cord Sleeve , 2010, Adv. Robotics.

[19]  C. Atkeson,et al.  A Continuum Approach to Safe Robots for Physical Human Interaction , 2011 .

[20]  Pierre Lopez,et al.  Modeling and control of McKibben artificial muscle robot actuators , 2000 .

[21]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  Jiping He,et al.  Characterization of the Dynamic Properties of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.