Information flow in logic for distributed systems: Extending graded consequence

Abstract In this paper we have proposed a variation of Barwise and Seligman’s proposal for information flow among a distributed network of agents by bringing in a notion of belief structure and a notion of graded inference. In their proposal, belief profile of an agent has played an important role as it is explicitly mentioned in the principles of information flow. In contrary, while developing the formal counterpart of information flow they did not address any connection with the belief profile of an agent. Besides, they have accommodated a non-deterministic notion of derivation to design the local logic of an agent keeping a room open for unsound inferences. Our proposal here is to bring in the notion of belief structure of an agent in the development of the local logic of an agent, and convert the non-deterministic nature of consequence to a deterministic graded (four-valued) notion of consequence. For the time being, we have focused on a specific context of decision making by aggregating opinions of agents based on an approach, known as the theory of graded consequence.

[1]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[2]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Interactive computations: toward risk management in interactive intelligent systems , 2013, Natural Computing.

[3]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Risk Management and Interactive Computational Systems , 2012 .

[4]  Andrzej Jankowski,et al.  Interactive Granular Computations in Networks and Systems Engineering: A Practical Perspective , 2017, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.

[5]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[6]  Jon Barwise,et al.  Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems , 1997 .

[7]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Multiagent Systems - Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations , 2009 .

[8]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .

[9]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Distributed Sensor Networks , 2003, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations.

[10]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough sets: past, present, and future , 2018, Natural Computing.

[11]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Toward Problem Solving Support Based on Big Data and Domain Knowledge: Interactive Granular Computing and Adaptive Judgement , 2016 .

[12]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Thriving Rough Sets , 2017 .

[13]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  From Information Systems to Interactive Information Systems , 2017 .

[14]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Approximate Reasoning in Distributed Environments , 2004 .

[15]  Jeremy Seligman Channels: From Logic to Probability , 2009, Formal Theories of Information.

[16]  Jeremy Seligman,et al.  Situation Theory Reconsidered , 2014, Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics.

[17]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[18]  Andrzej Szalas,et al.  Modeling and Reasoning with Paraconsistent Rough Sets , 2009, Fundam. Informaticae.

[19]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough sets: Some extensions , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Ensemble learning: A survey , 2018, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[21]  Chris Fields,et al.  A mosaic of Chu spaces and Channel Theory II: applications to object identification and mereological complexity , 2018, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Readings in agents , 1997 .

[23]  Andrzej Szalas,et al.  Taming Complex Beliefs , 2013, Trans. Comput. Collect. Intell..

[24]  T. Poggio,et al.  The Mathematics of Learning: Dealing with Data , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain.

[25]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Approximate reasoning by agents in distributed environments , 2001 .

[26]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Interactive granular computing , 2016 .

[27]  Wayne Martin,et al.  Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology , 2006 .

[28]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded Consequence: Further Studies , 1995, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[29]  Dave Barker-Plummer,et al.  The Barwise-Seligman Model of Representation Systems: A Philosophical Explication , 2014, Diagrams.

[30]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rudiments of rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Chris Fields,et al.  A mosaic of Chu spaces and Channel Theory I: Category-theoretic concepts and tools , 2018, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[32]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded Consequence with Fuzzy Set of Premises , 2014, Fundam. Informaticae.

[33]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough Sets in Interactive Granular Computing , 2015, CS&P.