The Role of Depth Stratification in the Solution of the Aperture Problem

When a plaid pattern composed of a stationary vertical grating and a horizontally drifting diagonal grating is shown behind a circular aperture, the pattern appears to move coherently in a vertical direction. When the bars of the stationary grating are narrower than those of the moving grating, only the latter is seen to move, in a direction orthogonal to its orientation (ie diagonal); but when the bars of the stationary grating are wider than those of the moving grating, vertical motion of the whole plaid predominates. It is argued that, in the absence of occlusion information, the motion of a plaid within an aperture depends on the unambiguous displacement of inner line terminators at the crossings of the two gratings. Relative motion and differences in bar width between the two gratings provide information about which set of bars is in front of the other. When these sources of information are consistent with each other, separation of the two gratings in depth occurs: inner line terminators no longer perceptually exist and the direction of motion becomes determined only by terminators at the edges, which causes a shift from vertical to orthogonal motion. Differences in luminance also provide (asymmetrical) information about depth relationships: when darker bars occlude lighter bars, the probability of orthogonal motion increases as a function of the difference in luminance, whereas when lighter bars are over darker bars, vertical motion prevails.

[1]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[2]  J. B. Mulligan,et al.  Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  Hans Wallach Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[4]  P. Bressan,et al.  Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion , 1991, Vision Research.

[5]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[6]  H. Egusa,et al.  Effect of Brightness on Perceived Distance as a Figure—Ground Phenomenon , 1982, Perception.

[7]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[8]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Depth effect from a rotating line of constant length , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.

[11]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Zeki Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[14]  S. Anstis,et al.  Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Direction of Ambiguous Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[15]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Leslie Welch,et al.  The perception of moving plaids reveals two motion-processing stages , 1989, Nature.

[18]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  T. D. Albright,et al.  Transparency and coherence in human motion perception , 1990, Nature.

[20]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  An occlusion-related mechanism of depth perception based on motion and interocular sequence , 1988, Nature.