Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure

We examine the extent to which performance effects of firms' network positions vary with the ages of the ties comprising those positions. Our analysis of Canadian investment banks' underwriting syndicate ties indicates that the performance benefits of closure ties increase with age, whereas benefits of bridging ties decrease with age. We also find that benefits yielded by hybrid network positions, combining elements of both closure and bridging, are greatest when old closure ties are combined with either very young or very old bridging ties. Our findings support the idea that the advantages firms gain (or do not) from their network positions depend on the relational character of the ties comprising them, highlighting the risk of theorizing structural network effects without also considering the relational and temporal dynamics associated with network positions.

[1]  Roni Michaely,et al.  When the Underwriter Is the Market Maker: An Examination of Trading in the IPO Aftermarket , 2000 .

[2]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[3]  D. Watts.  Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Venture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[7]  P. Doreian,et al.  Fixed list versus snowball selection of social networks , 1992 .

[8]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Contradictory or compatible? reconsidering the “trade-off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing , 2008 .

[9]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[12]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[13]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners , 2005 .

[15]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Autonomy in a Social Topology , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[17]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance , 1999 .

[18]  D. Krackhardt.  Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky , 1998 .

[19]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[20]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Status , 1996 .

[21]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations , 1976 .

[24]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[25]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[26]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Social Structure and Exchange: Self-confirming Dynamics in Hollywood , 2006 .

[27]  A SchillingMelissa,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks , 2007 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[29]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[30]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[31]  G. Walker,et al.  The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[32]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[33]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[34]  R. Jacobson.  Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .

[35]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Duynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships , 1988 .

[36]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[37]  J. Ritter.  The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[38]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[39]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[40]  H. White,et al.  Chains of Opportunity , 2014 .

[41]  M. Jensen.  The Role of Network Resources in Market Entry: Commercial Banks' Entry into Investment Banking, 1991–1997 , 2003 .

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  W. H. Hoffmann.  Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances , 2007 .

[44]  Mario Diani,et al.  The Integrative Power of Civic Networks1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Tim Rowley,et al.  Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks , 2002 .

[46]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[47]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[48]  G. Simmel.  The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[49]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[51]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[52]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[53]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[54]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  Randolph P. Beatty,et al.  INVESTMENT BANKING, REPUTATION, AND THE UNDERPRICING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS* , 1986 .

[56]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[57]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work. , 1989 .

[58]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[59]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view , 2002 .

[62]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[63]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Constructing Deal Networks: Brokers as Network “Architects” in the U.S. IPO Market and Other Examples , 2004 .

[64]  R. Burt.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[65]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[66]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[67]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  The Seven Percent Solution? An International Perspective on Underwriting Spreads , 2001 .

[68]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[69]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[70]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[71]  J. Ritter,et al.  The Seven Percent Solution , 2000 .