Feedforward Inhibition and Synaptic Scaling – Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Feedforward inhibition and synaptic scaling are important adaptive processes that control the total input a neuron can receive from its afferents. While often studied in isolation, the two have been reported to co-occur in various brain regions. The functional implications of their interactions remain unclear, however. Based on a probabilistic modeling approach, we show here that fast feedforward inhibition and synaptic scaling interact synergistically during unsupervised learning. In technical terms, we model the input to a neural circuit using a normalized mixture model with Poisson noise. We demonstrate analytically and numerically that, in the presence of lateral inhibition introducing competition between different neurons, Hebbian plasticity and synaptic scaling approximate the optimal maximum likelihood solutions for this model. Our results suggest that, beyond its conventional use as a mechanism to remove undesired pattern variations, input normalization can make typical neural interaction and learning rules optimal on the stimulus subspace defined through feedforward inhibition. Furthermore, learning within this subspace is more efficient in practice, as it helps avoid locally optimal solutions. Our results suggest a close connection between feedforward inhibition and synaptic scaling which may have important functional implications for general cortical processing.

[1]  Andrea Hasenstaub,et al.  Barrages of Synaptic Activity Control the Gain and Sensitivity of Cortical Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Synaptic background noise controls the input/output characteristics of single cells in an in vitro model of in vivo activity , 2003, Neuroscience.

[3]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[5]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Latent variable models for neural data analysis , 1999 .

[6]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[7]  Tomoki Fukai,et al.  A Simple Neural Network Exhibiting Selective Activation of Neuronal Ensembles: From Winner-Take-All to Winners-Share-All , 1997, Neural Computation.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[9]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  Activity Coregulates Quantal AMPA and NMDA Currents at Neocortical Synapses , 2000, Neuron.

[10]  Silvia Arber,et al.  Requirement for the Homeobox Gene Hb9 in the Consolidation of Motor Neuron Identity , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Feed‐forward inhibition shapes the spike output of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Marc'Aurelio Ranzato,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object Recognition , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Ivan Soltesz,et al.  Homeostatic Plasticity Studied Using In Vivo Hippocampal Activity-Blockade: Synaptic Scaling, Intrinsic Plasticity and Age-Dependence , 2007, PloS one.

[14]  H. Swadlow Fast-spike interneurons and feedforward inhibition in awake sensory neocortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  John L. Wyatt,et al.  The Softmax Nonlinearity: Derivation Using Statistical Mechanics and Useful Properties as a Multiterminal Analog Circuit Element , 1993, NIPS.

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants , 1998, Learning in Graphical Models.

[17]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  A Normalization Model of Multisensory Integration , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  A Winner-Take-All Mechanism Based on Presynaptic Inhibition Feedback , 1989, Neural Computation.

[19]  Yann LeCun,et al.  The mnist database of handwritten digits , 2005 .

[20]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Laurent,et al.  Adaptive regulation of sparseness by feedforward inhibition , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Neil C. Rabinowitz,et al.  Contrast Gain Control in Auditory Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[23]  G. Turrigiano The Self-Tuning Neuron: Synaptic Scaling of Excitatory Synapses , 2008, Cell.

[24]  John R. Huguenard,et al.  Modulation of neocortical interneurons: extrinsic influences and exercises in self-control , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[26]  V. Jayaraman,et al.  Intensity versus Identity Coding in an Olfactory System , 2003, Neuron.

[27]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Emergence of Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Mathematical formulations of Hebbian learning , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Sacha B. Nelson,et al.  Postsynaptic Depolarization Scales Quantal Amplitude in Cortical Pyramidal Neurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Scanziani,et al.  How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity , 2011, Neuron.

[31]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[32]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets , 2006, Neural Computation.

[33]  Mingqi Deng,et al.  Winner-take-all networks , 1992 .

[34]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural Sound Statistics and Divisive Normalization in the Auditory System , 2000, NIPS.

[35]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Optimization via Intermittency with a Self-Organizing Neural Network , 2005, Neural Computation.

[36]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[37]  R. Douglas,et al.  Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Shawn R. Olsen,et al.  Divisive Normalization in Olfactory Population Codes , 2010, Neuron.

[40]  A. Smit,et al.  Synapse Formation between Central Neurons Requires Postsynaptic Expression of the MEN1 Tumor Suppressor Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Classification with scattering operators , 2010, CVPR 2011.

[42]  S. Denéve,et al.  Neural processing as causal inference , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Niraj S. Desai,et al.  Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[44]  M. Meister,et al.  Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry , 2002, Neuron.

[45]  A. Blokland,et al.  Acetylcholine and attention , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[46]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input , 2002, Neuron.

[47]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function.Neural Information Processing Series.Edited byRajesh P N Rao, Bruno A Olshausen, and, Michael S Lewicki.A Bradford Book. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.$50.00. x + 324 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–262–18224–6. 2002. , 2003 .

[49]  Jörg Lücke,et al.  Maximal Causes for Non-linear Component Extraction , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[50]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[51]  Shawn R. Olsen,et al.  Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit , 2008, Nature.

[52]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Differential tuning and population dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory neurons reflect differences in local intracortical connectivity , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[54]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[55]  L. Trussell,et al.  Spontaneous Spiking and Synaptic Depression Underlie Noradrenergic Control of Feed-Forward Inhibition , 2011, Neuron.

[56]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern classification, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[57]  H. Adesnik,et al.  Input normalization by global feedforward inhibition expands cortical dynamic range , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Zador,et al.  Synaptic Mechanisms of Forward Suppression in Rat Auditory Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[59]  Naonori Ueda,et al.  Deterministic annealing EM algorithm , 1998, Neural Networks.

[60]  S. Nelson,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[62]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  József Fiser,et al.  Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment , 2011, Science.

[64]  Shih-Chii Liu A Winner-Take-All Circuit with Controllable Soft Max Property , 1999, NIPS.

[65]  Hans R. Gelderblom,et al.  Enforcement of Temporal Fidelity in Pyramidal Cells by Somatic Feed-Forward Inhibition , 2001 .

[66]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Dynamics of Winner-Take-All Competition in Recurrent Neural Networks With Lateral Inhibition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[67]  D. Ringach Population coding under normalization , 2010, Vision Research.