Exploring the Performance of Different On-Demand Transit Services Provided by a Fleet of Shared Automated Vehicles: An Agent-Based Model

Automated vehicles used as public transport show a great promise of revolutionizing current transportation systems. Still, there are many questions as to how these systems should be organized and operated in cities to bring the best out of future services. In this study, an agent-based model (ABM) is developed to simulate the on-demand operations of shared automated vehicles (SAVs) in a parallel transit service (PTS) and a tailored time-varying transit service (TVTS). The proposed TVTS system can switch service schemes between a door-to-door service (DDS) and a station-to-station service (SSS) according to what is best for the service providers and the travelers. In addition, the proposed PTS system that allows DDS and SSS to operate simultaneously is simulated. To test the conceptual design of the proposed SAV system, simulation experiments are performed in a hypothetical urban area to show the potential of different SAV schemes. Simulation results suggest that SAV systems together with dynamic ridesharing can significantly reduce average waiting time, the vehicle kilometres travelled and empty SAV trips. Moreover, the proposed optimal vehicle assignment algorithm can significantly reduce the empty vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) for the pickups for all tested SAV systems up to about 40% and improve the system capacity for transporting the passengers. Comparing the TVTS system, which has inconvenient access in peak hours, with the PTS systems, which always makes available door-to-door transport, we conclude that the latter could achieve a similar system performance as the former in terms of average waiting time, service time and system capacity.

[1]  Felipe F. Dias,et al.  Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2017 .

[2]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[4]  C. Daganzo Checkpoint dial-a-ride systems , 1984 .

[5]  Alain L. Kornhauser,et al.  Uncongested Mobility for All: A Proposal for an Area Wide Autonomous Taxi System in New Jersey , 2014 .

[6]  Francesco Ciari,et al.  Agent-based simulation of autonomous cars , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[7]  Fernando Ordóñez,et al.  Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions , 2013 .

[8]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Optimizing the service area and trip selection of an electric automated taxi system used for the last mile of train trips , 2016 .

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of a Shared, Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle & Charging Infrastructure Decisions , 2016 .

[10]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal , 2017 .

[11]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles , 2015 .

[12]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[13]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas , 2018 .

[14]  Tetsuo Tezuka,et al.  Optimization of shared autonomous electric vehicles operations with charge scheduling and vehicle-to-grid , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[15]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility , 2016 .

[16]  Markus Lienkamp,et al.  Agent-based simulation of a shared, autonomous and electric on-demand mobility solution , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[17]  Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia,et al.  Delft University of Technology Exploring the use of automated vehicles as last mile connection of train trips through an agent-based simulation model An application to Delft, Netherlands , 2018 .

[18]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet for Austin, Texas, Market , 2015 .

[19]  I. Nourbakhsh,et al.  On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[21]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Fleet performance and cost evaluation of a shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) fleet: A case study for Austin, Texas , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[22]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[23]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[24]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Autonomous Shared Mobility-On-Demand: Melbourne Pilot Simulation Study , 2017 .

[26]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015 .

[27]  Neda Masoud Autonomous or Driverless Vehicles : Implementation Strategies and Operational Concerns Transportation Research Part E , 2017 .

[28]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[29]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services , 2017 .

[30]  Yang Liu,et al.  A Framework to Integrate Mode Choice in the Design of Mobility-on-Demand Systems , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[31]  Bing Wu,et al.  Speed variation during peak and off-peak hours on urban arterials in Shanghai , 2016 .