A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance

Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of a molecular docking method depend on the choice of protein structures used for docking. Multiple structures for a target protein are often used to take into account the receptor flexibility and problems associated with a single receptor structure. However, the use of multiple receptor structures is computationally expensive when docking a large library of small molecules. Here, we propose a new cross-docking pipeline suitable to dock a large library of molecules while taking advantage of multiple target protein structures. Our method involves the selection of a suitable receptor for each ligand in a screening library utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity with crystallographic ligands. We have prospectively evaluated our method in D3R Grand Challenge 2 and demonstrated that our cross-docking pipeline can achieve similar or better performance than using either single or multiple-receptor structures. Moreover, our method displayed not only decent pose prediction performance but also better virtual screening performance over several other methods.Graphical Abstract

[1]  Chung F. Wong,et al.  Flexible receptor docking for drug discovery , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[2]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Systematic Exploitation of Multiple Receptor Conformations for Virtual Ligand Screening , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Mengang Xu,et al.  Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .

[6]  J. Tuszynski,et al.  Software for molecular docking: a review , 2017, Biophysical Reviews.

[7]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Computational approaches for fragment-based and de novo design. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Benjamin A. Ellingson,et al.  Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Leonardo L. G. Ferreira,et al.  Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies , 2015, Molecules.

[10]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Learning from the Data Set and the Analysis of Failures , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  D J Rogers,et al.  A Computer Program for Classifying Plants. , 1960, Science.

[12]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  Identification of 1, 2, 5-Oxadiazoles as a New Class of SENP2 Inhibitors Using Structure Based Virtual Screening , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Hugo O. Villar - Library Design, Chemical Space, and Drug Likeness , 2015 .

[17]  Elizabeth Yuriev,et al.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review , 2011, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[18]  Carlos J. Camacho,et al.  Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[19]  Yan Li,et al.  Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Chung F. Wong,et al.  Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  Ashutosh Kumar,et al.  Computational fragment-based screening using RosettaLigand: the SAMPL3 challenge , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[23]  Xufeng Cao,et al.  Design , Synthesis , and Structure − Activity Relationship Studies of Novel Fused Heterocycles-Linked Triazoles with Good Activity and Water Solubility , 2014 .

[24]  David Calkins,et al.  Towards the comprehensive, rapid, and accurate prediction of the favorable tautomeric states of drug-like molecules in aqueous solution , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[25]  Yu-chian Chen Beware of docking! , 2015, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[26]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Structural basis for modulation of a G-protein-coupled receptor by allosteric drugs , 2013, Nature.

[27]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  Identification of Sumoylation Inhibitors Targeting a Predicted Pocket in Ubc9 , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  Elizabeth Yuriev,et al.  Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review , 2013, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[33]  Ashutosh Kumar,et al.  A Novel Scaffold for Developing Specific or Broad-Spectrum Chitinase Inhibitors , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[34]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Challenges, Applications, and Recent Advances of Protein-Ligand Docking in Structure-Based Drug Design , 2014, Molecules.

[35]  G. Klebe,et al.  DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[38]  Shuai Liu,et al.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[39]  Jessica Holien,et al.  Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review , 2015, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[40]  Ashutosh Kumar,et al.  A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[41]  Peter S Kutchukian,et al.  De novo design: balancing novelty and confined chemical space , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[42]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT) , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[43]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Christoph A. Sotriffer,et al.  - Protein–Ligand Docking: From Basic Principles to Advanced Applications , 2015 .

[45]  L. Kavraki,et al.  Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[46]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  Identification of Sumoylation Activating Enzyme 1 Inhibitors by Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[48]  Jian Jin,et al.  Structure-Activity Relationship Studies for Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 2 (EZH2) and Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 1 (EZH1) Inhibitors. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[50]  Jeremy R. Greenwood,et al.  Epik: a software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[51]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  Discovery of Fungal Denitrification Inhibitors by Targeting Copper Nitrite Reductase from Fusarium oxysporum , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[52]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..