Frequency domain identification of continuous-time output-error models with time-delay from relay feedback tests

This paper is concerned with identification of continuous-time output-error models with time-delay from relay feedback tests. Conventional methods for solving this problem consist in deriving analytical limit cycle expressions and fitting them to measured shape factors. However, they may fail to handle different limit cycles uniformly, due to the structural differences in the analytical expressions. To overcome this problem, we consider a more general, data-based, parametric identification framework using sampled limit cycle data. A frequency domain method that minimizes the sum of squared output-errors is developed. The proposed method can be of high accuracy, thanks to the periodic input–output signals provided by sustained relay feedback oscillations, which can help to reduce leakage and aliasing errors. Besides, a distinctive merit of the proposed method is that identification of stable and unstable plants can be equally simple. The effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method are demonstrated by means of both theoretical analyses and simulation examples.

[1]  D. Atherton Relay autotuning : An overview and alternative approach , 2006 .

[2]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Issues in sampling and estimating continuous-time models with stochastic disturbances , 2010, Autom..

[3]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[4]  Riccardo Scattolini,et al.  On the identifiability of the time delay with least-squares methods , 1996, Autom..

[5]  Peter C. Young,et al.  The advantages of directly identifying continuous-time transfer function models in practical applications , 2014, Int. J. Control.

[6]  K. Åström Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory , 1970 .

[7]  G. Goodwin,et al.  Identification of continuous-time state-space models from non-uniform fast-sampled data , 2011 .

[8]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  Analytical expressions for relay feed back responses , 2003 .

[9]  T. Söderström,et al.  Instrumental variable methods for system identification , 1983 .

[10]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Sampling and sampled-data models , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[11]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Optimally conditioned instrumental variable approach for frequency-domain system identification , 2014, Autom..

[12]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specifications on phase and amplitude margins , 1984, Autom..

[13]  Adrian Wills,et al.  Issues in sampling and estimating continuous-time models with stochastic disturbances , 2008 .

[14]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Frequency domain identification of continuous-time output error models, Part I: Uniformly sampled data and frequency function approximation , 2010, Autom..

[15]  Wei Xing Zheng,et al.  Optimizing search-based identification of stochastic time-delay systems , 1991 .

[16]  Qing-Guo Wang,et al.  Robust closed-loop identification with application to auto-tuning , 2001 .

[17]  Arnaud Baysse,et al.  Time domain identification of continuous-time systems with time delay using output error method from sampled data , 2011 .

[18]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Identification and estimation of continuous-time, data-based mechanistic (DBM) models for environmental systems , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Frequency domain weighted nonlinear least squares estimation of parameter-varying differential equations , 2017, Autom..

[20]  R. Pupeikis Recursive Estimation of the Parameters of Linear Systems with Time Delay , 1985 .

[21]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Frequency-domain Approach to Continuous-time System Identification: Some Practical Aspects , 2008 .

[22]  M. Gilson,et al.  Robust identification of continuous-time models with arbitrary time-delay from irregularly sampled data , 2015 .

[23]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[24]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[25]  Somanath Majhi Relay-Based Identification of a Class of Nonminimum Phase SISO Processes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[26]  Hugues Garnier,et al.  Robust time-domain output error method for identifying continuous-time systems with time delay , 2017, Syst. Control. Lett..

[27]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  A modified relay autotuner for systems having large broadband disturbances , 2018, Autom..

[28]  Marion Gilson,et al.  A Frequency Localizing Basis Function-Based IV Method for Wideband System Identification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[29]  Hsiao-Ping Huang,et al.  Auto-Tuning of PID Controllers for Second Order Unstable Process Having Dead Time , 1999 .

[30]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Relay Feedback Auto-tuning of Process Controllers – A Tutorial Review , 2002 .

[31]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Identification of continuous-time systems using arbitrary signals , 1997, Autom..

[32]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  ROBUSTNESS ISSUES IN CONTINUOUS-TIME SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FROM SAMPLED DATA , 2005 .

[33]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Refined instrumental variable estimation: Maximum likelihood optimization of a unified Box-Jenkins model , 2015, Autom..

[34]  Somanath Majhi,et al.  Identification of non-minimum phase processes with time delay in the presence of measurement noise. , 2015, ISA transactions.

[35]  Qing-Guo Wang,et al.  Low-Order Modeling from Relay Feedback , 1997 .

[36]  Xiangtao Zhuan,et al.  Issues in separable identification of continuous-time models with time-delay , 2018, Autom..

[37]  Somanath Majhi,et al.  Obtaining controller parameters for a new Smith predictor using autotuning , 2000, Autom..

[38]  Hugues Garnier,et al.  Continuous-time model identification from sampled data: Implementation issues and performance evaluation , 2003 .

[39]  Feng Ding,et al.  Joint state and multi-innovation parameter estimation for time-delay linear systems and its convergence based on the Kalman filtering , 2017, Digit. Signal Process..

[40]  Marion Gilson,et al.  Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification , 2005, Autom..