Concurrent Multisensory Integration and Segregation with Complementary Congruent and Opposite Neurons

Our brain perceives the world by exploiting multiple sensory modalities to extract information about various aspects of external stimuli. If these sensory cues are from the same stimulus of interest, they should be integrated to improve perception; otherwise, they should be segregated to distinguish different stimuli. In reality, however, the brain faces the challenge of recognizing stimuli without knowing in advance whether sensory cues come from the same or different stimuli. To address this challenge and to recognize stimuli rapidly, we argue that the brain should carry out multisensory integration and segregation concurrently with complementary neuron groups. Studying an example of inferring heading-direction via visual and vestibular cues, we develop a concurrent multisensory processing neural model which consists of two reciprocally connected modules, the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) and the ventral intraparietal area (VIP), and that at each module, there exists two distinguishing groups of neurons, congruent and opposite neurons. Specifically, congruent neurons implement cue integration, while opposite neurons compute the cue disparity, both optimally as described by Bayesian inference. The two groups of neurons provide complementary information which enables the neural system to assess the validity of cue integration and, if necessary, to recover the lost information associated with individual cues without re-gathering new inputs. Through this process, the brain achieves rapid stimulus perception if the cues come from the same stimulus of interest, and differentiates and recognizes stimuli based on individual cues with little time delay if the cues come from different stimuli of interest. Our study unveils the indispensable role of opposite neurons in multisensory processing and sheds light on our understanding of how the brain achieves multisensory processing efficiently and rapidly. Significance Statement Our brain perceives the world by exploiting multiple sensory cues. These cues need to be integrated to improve perception if they come from the same stimulus and otherwise be segregated. To address the challenge of recognizing whether sensory cues come from the same or different stimuli that are unknown in advance, we propose that the brain should carry out multisensory integration and segregation concurrently with two different neuron groups. Specifically, congruent neurons implement cue integration, while opposite neurons compute the cue disparity, and the interplay between them achieves rapid stimulus recognition without information loss. We apply our model to the example of inferring heading-direction based on visual and vestibular cues and reproduce the experimental data successfully.

[1]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study , 2002, Neural Computation.

[2]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. Morad,et al.  Ceramide-orchestrated signalling in cancer cells , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  Marc O. Ernst,et al.  A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration , 2006 .

[5]  Gilles Dowek,et al.  What Is a Theory? , 2002, STACS.

[6]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Wallace,et al.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  K. Zhang,et al.  Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Ahna R Girshick,et al.  Probabilistic combination of slant information: weighted averaging and robustness as optimal percepts. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[12]  R. Born Center-surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Guillaume A Rousselet,et al.  Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: a cross-cultural study. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[14]  Si Wu,et al.  Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors , 2008, Neural Computation.

[15]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Xiao-Jing Wang Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits , 2008, Neuron.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[18]  David R. Wozny,et al.  Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Functional Specializations of the Ventral Intraparietal Area for Multisensory Heading Discrimination , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  M. Rasch,et al.  Decentralized Multisensory Information Integration in Neural Systems , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Giese,et al.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[23]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  Stéphane Rainville,et al.  Motion grouping/segmentation via velocity gradients , 2010 .

[26]  Tatiana A. Engel,et al.  Same or Different? A Neural Circuit Mechanism of Similarity-Based Pattern Match Decision Making , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Yong Gu,et al.  Multisensory Convergence of Visual and Vestibular Heading Cues in the Pursuit Area of the Frontal Eye Field. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Yong Gu,et al.  Causal Links between Dorsal Medial Superior Temporal Area Neurons and Multisensory Heading Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Joint Representation of Depth from Motion Parallax and Binocular Disparity Cues in Macaque Area MT , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Si Wu,et al.  A Moving Bump in a Continuous Manifold: A Comprehensive Study of the Tracking Dynamics of Continuous Attractor Neural Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[36]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Visual and Nonvisual Contributions to Three-Dimensional Heading Selectivity in the Medial Superior Temporal Area , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  W. Wildman,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience , 2014 .

[38]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli , 2007, Neural Computation.

[39]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Richard F Murray,et al.  Cue combination on the circle and the sphere. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[41]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  David Melcher,et al.  Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[43]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Characterizing global and local mechanisms in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[44]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Jean-Pierre Bresciani,et al.  Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[48]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Representation of Vestibular and Visual Cues to Self-Motion in Ventral Intraparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[50]  Si Wu,et al.  Neural Information Processing with Feedback Modulations , 2012, Neural Computation.

[51]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multisensory Integration in Macaque Visual Cortex Depends on Cue Reliability , 2008, Neuron.

[52]  Chi Chung Fung Dynamics of continuous attractor neural networks , 2010 .

[53]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.