Indoor Multi-Vehicle Flight Testbed for Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery

This paper presents flight tests of a unique indoor, multi-vehicle testbed that was developed to study long duration UAV missions in a controlled environment. This testbed uses real hardware to examine research questions related to single and multi-vehicle health management, such as vehicle failures, refueling, and maintenance. The primary goal of the project is to embed health management into the full UAV planning system, thereby leading to improved overall mission performance, even when using simple aircraft that are prone to failures. The testbed has both aerial and ground vehicles that operate autonomously in a large test region and can be used to execute many different mission scenarios. The success of this testbed is largely related to our choice of vehicles, sensors, and the system’s command and control architecture, which has resulted in a testbed that is very simple to operate. This paper discusses this testbed infrastructure and presents flight test results from some of our most recent singleand multi-vehicle experiments.

[1]  S. Sastry,et al.  Autonomous Exploration in Unknown Urban Environments for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2005 .

[2]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Implementation of a Manned Vehicle - UAV Mission System , 2004 .

[3]  Steven L. Waslander,et al.  The Stanford testbed of autonomous rotorcraft for multi agent control (STARMAC) , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[4]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Aggressive Maneuvering of Small Autonomous Helicopters: A Human-Centered Approach , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Bernard Mettler,et al.  Flight test and simulation results for an autonomous aerobatic helicopter , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[6]  Armand Prieditis,et al.  SmartSwarms: Distributed UAVs that Think , 2004 .

[7]  T.W. McLain,et al.  Vector field path following for small unmanned air vehicles , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[8]  A. Stubbs,et al.  A hovercraft testbed for decentralized and cooperative control , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[9]  Michael Fudge,et al.  Non-Traditional Flight Safety Systems & Integrated Vehicle Health Management Systems Descriptions of Proposed & Existing Systems and Enabling Technologies & Verification Methods , 2003 .

[10]  Rodney Teo,et al.  DragonFly: a versatile UAV platform for the advancement of aircraft navigation and control , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[11]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Swarming Coordination of Multiple UAV's for Collaborative Sensing , 2003 .

[12]  J.P. Hespanha,et al.  Multiple-agent probabilistic pursuit-evasion games , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[13]  John Woods,et al.  Beyond swarm intelligence: the UltraSwarm , 2005, Proceedings 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005..

[14]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  Eric W. Frew,et al.  Flight Demonstrations of Self-directed Collaborative Navigation of Small Unmanned Aircraft , 2004 .

[16]  Yoshiaki Kuwata,et al.  Flight Demonstrations of Cooperative Control for UAV Teams , 2004 .

[17]  J. How,et al.  Coordination and control experiments on a multi-vehicle testbed , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[18]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Control of UAV Swarms: What the Bugs Can Teach Us , 2003 .

[19]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Pursuit-evasion games with unmanned ground and aerial vehicles , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).