Flexible adjustment of the effective connectivity between the fronto-parietal and visual regions supports cognitive flexibility

Evidence indicates the significance of the fronto-parietal regions and inertia sensory processing from previous trials in cognitive flexibility. However, how flexible cognitive performance is achieved by causal interactions between cortical regions, particularly those between the fronto-parietal and stimulus processing regions, remains unknown. In the current study, the effective connectivity between the fronto-parietal and visual regions was examined in the context of a cued task-switching paradigm. We found that the fronto-parietal and visual cortex were differently activated during task transition (task repeat and task switch). Importantly, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) analysis revealed that task transition could modulate the effective connectivity between the fronto-parietal and visual cortex: task repeat decreased, while task switch enhanced, the coupling between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the visual cortex. Furthermore, Granger causality analysis (GCA) showed that the dominant direction of influence was from the fronto-parietal regions to the visual cortex. Finally, individual differences in the top-down influence from the PPC to the visual cortex and the corresponding neural adjustment (task switch‒task repeat) was negatively associated with the behavioral switch cost. Our findings suggest that the interaction between the fronto-parietal and stimulus processing regions, particularly the top-down influence from the PPC to the visual cortex, is of particular importance in flexible cognitive performance.

[1]  B. Liefooghe.  The contribution of task-choice response selection to the switch cost in voluntary task switching. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[2]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[3]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The role of inferior frontal junction in controlling the spatially global effect of feature-based attention in human visual areas , 2018, PLoS biology.

[5]  S. Monsell,et al.  A change of task prolongs early processes: evidence from ERPs in lexical tasks. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Individual Variability in Brain Activity: A Nuisance or an Opportunity? , 2008, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[10]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels , 2014 .

[12]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels , 2014, Neuron.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Striatal Prediction Error Modulates Cortical Coupling , 2010 .

[15]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Noise in Neural Populations Accounts for Errors in Working Memory , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The hierarchical organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex , 2016, eLife.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  E. Miller,et al.  Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices , 2007, Science.

[19]  G. Logan,et al.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  H. Müller,et al.  Task preparation and neural activation in stimulus-specific brain regions: An fMRI study with the cued task-switching paradigm , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Task Switching: Mechanisms Underlying Rigid vs. Flexible Self-control , 2009 .

[22]  Dirk B. Walther,et al.  Task-set switching with natural scenes: measuring the cost of deploying top-down attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[23]  P. Bays.  Spikes not slots: noise in neural populations limits working memory , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Striatal activation as a neural link between cognitive and perceptual flexibility , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  E. Keller,et al.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[27]  Jon Driver,et al.  Integration of Goal- and Stimulus-Related Visual Signals Revealed by Damage to Human Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Holly N. Phillips,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Frontotemporal Networks for the Prediction of Stimuli across Multiple Dimensions , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Lasse S Loose,et al.  Switch independent task representations in frontal and parietal cortex , 2017, bioRxiv.

[30]  R. Cools,et al.  Selective attentional enhancement and inhibition of fronto-posterior connectivity by the basal ganglia during attention switching. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[32]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[33]  I. Koch,et al.  Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Christophe Phillips,et al.  Depression alters “top-down” visual attention: A dynamic causal modeling comparison between depressed and healthy subjects , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  G. D. Logan.  Task Switching , 2022 .

[38]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Deconstructing the Architecture of Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems with Dynamic Causal Modeling , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  K. Amunts,et al.  Effective connectivity of the left BA 44, BA 45, and inferior temporal gyrus during lexical and phonological decisions identified with DCM , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[42]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[43]  Pablo Campo,et al.  Time-Varying Effective Connectivity during Visual Object Naming as a Function of Semantic Demands , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Network Interactions Explain Sensitivity to Dynamic Faces in the Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Strengthening of Top-Down Frontal Cognitive Control Networks Underlying the Development of Inhibitory Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Effective Connectivity Study , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  T. Egner,et al.  Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex , 2018, eLife.

[50]  S. Monsell,et al.  Shifting Attention Between Visual Dimensions as a Source of Switch Costs , 2017, Psychological science.

[51]  M. Hughes,et al.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching , 2010, NeuroImage.

[52]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  Functional and structural architecture of the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  Jelle Demanet,et al.  Component Processes in Voluntary Task Switching , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Interhemispheric Integration of Visual Processing during Task-Driven Lateralization , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Getting a Grip on Cognitive Flexibility , 2018, Current directions in psychological science.

[57]  R. Ptak.  The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[58]  A. Owen,et al.  A Thalamocortical Mechanism for the Absence of Overt Motor Behavior in Covertly Aware Patients. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[59]  C. Constantinidis,et al.  Early involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual bottom up attention , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-down influences on visual processing , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[62]  Stefan Bode,et al.  Changes in Effective Connectivity Between Dorsal and Ventral Prefrontal Regions Moderate Emotion Regulation. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Arto Luoma,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection , 2016 .

[64]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[66]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[67]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Inhibition of Information Flow to the Default Mode Network During Self-Reference Versus Reference to Others , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  T. Yarkoni.  Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[69]  G. Rees,et al.  The Neural Bases of Multistable Perception , 2022 .

[70]  Franziska M. Korb,et al.  Affective Modulation of Cognitive Control is Determined by Performance-Contingency and Mediated by Ventromedial Prefrontal and Cingulate Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search , 1993, Nature.

[72]  N. Meiran,et al.  On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[73]  G. Mangun,et al.  Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[74]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[75]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[76]  Lucina Q. Uddin,et al.  Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[77]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching , 2019, NeuroImage.

[78]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[79]  David K. Menon,et al.  Default mode contributions to automated information processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Yi Wang,et al.  Cross-language differences in the brain network subserving intelligible speech , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  B. Mittelman,et al.  On control. , 1979, Dental management.

[82]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  Jason G. Goldman,et al.  Top-down control. , 2014, Scientific American.

[85]  H. Rockoff.  On the Origins of , 2006 .

[86]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[87]  F. Karayanidis,et al.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: Reviewing a decade of fMRI research , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[88]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Effective connectivity within the frontoparietal control network differentiates cognitive control and working memory , 2015, NeuroImage.

[89]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  S. Yantis,et al.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[91]  L. Bai,et al.  The Development of Native Chinese Affective Picture System-A pretest in 46 College Students , 2005 .

[92]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Causal evidence for lateral prefrontal cortex dynamics supporting cognitive control , 2017, bioRxiv.

[93]  J. Bisley,et al.  A pure salience response in posterior parietal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[94]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of the Action Observation Network by Movement Familiarity , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[95]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[96]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[97]  Ulrike Basten,et al.  Functional Connectivity Separates Switching Operations in the Posterior Lateral Frontal Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[98]  R. Blake,et al.  Multistable Perception and the Role of the Frontoparietal Cortex in Perceptual Inference. , 2018, Annual review of psychology.