The concept of mobility in single- and double handed manipulation.

The concept of mobility describes an important property of the human body when performing manipulation tasks. It describes, in a sense, how easy it is to accelerate a link or a point on the manipulator. Most often it is calculated for the end-link or end-point of the manipulator, since these are important for the control objective of the manipulator. Mobility is the inverse of the inertia experienced by a force acting on the end-point, or a combined force and torque acting on the end-link. The concept has been used in studies of reaching tasks with one arm, but thus far not for bi-manual manipulation. We present here the concept for both single-handed and double-handed manipulation, in a general manner which includes any type of grip of the hands on the object. The use of the concept is illustrated with data on the left and right arm in a golf swing.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation , 1985 .

[2]  Daniel R Lametti,et al.  Control of movement variability and the regulation of limb impedance. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Torsten Söderström,et al.  Using an extended kalman filter for rigid body pose estimation. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Kjartan Halvorsen,et al.  Tracking the motion of hidden segments using kinematic constraints and Kalman filtering. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[6]  L. Selen,et al.  Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  The Role of Inertial Sensitivity in Motor Planning , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[9]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[10]  P. Leva Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996 .

[11]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part III—Applications , 1985 .

[12]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[13]  P. Cisek,et al.  The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.