Hysteresis effects in stereopsis and binocular rivalry

Neural hysteresis plays a fundamental role in stereopsis and reveals the existence of positive feedback at the cortical level [Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1973). A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik 13(2), 55-80]. We measured hysteresis as a function of orientation disparity in tilted gratings in which a transition is perceived between stereopsis and binocular rivalry. The patterns consisted of sinusoidal gratings with orientation disparities (0 degrees, 1 degrees, 2 degrees,..., 40 degrees) resulting in various degrees of tilt. A movie of these 41 pattern pairs was shown at a rate of 0.5, 1 or 2 pattern pairs per second, in forward or reverse order. Two transition points were measured: the point at which the single tilted grating appeared to split into two rivalrous gratings (T1), and the point at which two rivalrous gratings appeared to merge into a single tilted grating (T2). The transitions occurred at different orientation disparities (T1=25.4 degrees, T2=17.0 degrees) which was consistent with hysteresis and far exceeded the difference which could be attributed to reaction time. The results are consistent with a cortical model which includes positive feedback and recurrent inhibition between neural units representing different eyes and orientations.

[1]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity , 1988 .

[2]  R. Watt Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[4]  G H Fisher,et al.  Measuring ambiguity. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Javid Sadr Visual perception and representation of objects and faces , 2003 .

[6]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[7]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the coexistence of stereopsis and binocular rivalry , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Regan,et al.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Vision and visual dysfunction. , 1994, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[11]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.

[12]  R Sekuler,et al.  Contrast response of human visual mechanismsensitive to orientation and direction of motion. , 1969, Vision research.

[13]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[14]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Evidence for disparity detecting neurones in the human visual system , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  K. Prazdny Detection of binocular disparities , 2004, Biological cybernetics.

[17]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  B. Julesz,et al.  Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[20]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Biologically motivated computer vision : Second International Workshop, BMCV 2002, Tübingen, Germany, November 22-24, 2002 : proceedings , 2002 .

[21]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Binocular fusion limits are independent of contrast, luminance gradient and component phases , 1989, Vision Research.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Neural Structures Expressing Perceptual Hysteresis in Visual Letter Recognition , 2002, Neuron.

[23]  B Julesz,et al.  Eye movements and neural remapping during fusion of misaligned random-dot stereograms. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[26]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory , 2007, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[28]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[29]  Dante R. Chialvo,et al.  Modulated noisy biological dynamics: Three examples , 1993 .

[30]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram , 1988, Vision Research.

[31]  Thomas P. Piantanida,et al.  Stereo hysteresis revisited , 1986, Vision Research.

[32]  T. Kumar,et al.  Multiple matching of features in simple stereograms , 1996, Vision Research.

[33]  Howard S Hock,et al.  Dynamical vs. judgmental comparison: hysteresis effects in motion perception. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[34]  H. Smallman,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  B. Julesz Cooperative phenomena in binocular depth perception. , 1974, American scientist.

[36]  B. Julesz,et al.  The neural transfer characteristic (neurontropy) for binocular stochastic stimulation , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[38]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[39]  S P McKee,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Disrupts Stereopsis , 1994, Perception.

[40]  K N OGLE,et al.  Stereoscopic vision and the duration of the stimulus. , 1958, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  R. Blake A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[42]  P. Atchley,et al.  Cooperativity, priming, and 3-D surface detection from optic flow , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[44]  D. Hubel,et al.  Stereoscopic Vision in Macaque Monkey: Cells sensitive to Binocular Depth in Area 18 of the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 1970, Nature.

[45]  B L Anderson,et al.  Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity , 1986, Nature.

[47]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[48]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[50]  B. Julesz,et al.  Cooperative phenomena in apparent movement perception of random-dot cinematograms , 1984, Vision Research.

[51]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Hysteresis in binocular grating perception: Contrast effects , 1977, Vision Research.

[52]  J P Frisby,et al.  Computation of Stereo Disparity from Rivalrous Texture Stereograms , 1977, Perception.

[53]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[54]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  E. A. Tunnicliff,et al.  A FILTERABLE VIRUS DEMONSTRATED TO BE THE INFECTIVE AGENT IN OVINE BALANO-POSTHITIS. , 1941, Science.

[56]  B. Julesz,et al.  Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation, in binocular fusion and rivalry , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[57]  H. Wilson,et al.  Interaction between binocular rivalry and depth in plaid patterns , 2007, Vision Research.

[58]  G. Sperling Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[59]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Binocular cross-correlation in time and space , 1978, Vision Research.

[60]  D H Fender,et al.  Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: temporalward and nasalward ranges. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[61]  J P Frisby,et al.  PMF: A Stereo Correspondence Algorithm Using a Disparity Gradient Limit , 1985, Perception.

[62]  Jeffrey Spivak A Cyclopean Vision , 2010 .

[63]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.