Developing a smart environment for crisis management training

Despite the growth of advanced communication technologies, smart devices etc. the main approach to training strategic planners for crisis management (Gold Commanders) continues to be a paper-based, collective group dynamic exercise. The Pandora project has developed an advanced smart environment for the training of Gold Commanders which uses AI planning techniques to provide a crisis scenario modelled as an event network. This includes points of decision for trainees managed by automated rules from a knowledge base, behavioural modelling of the trainees, and ambient management of the environment to provide affective inputs to control and manage trainee stress. In this context, the system controls and reacts to trainee performance in relation to the events and decision points and can dynamically remodel and reconfigure the event network to respond appropriately to trainee decisions. Trainees can also be pressurised through compression of the timelines or ambient management of the multimedia information presented within the environment, causing them to make decisions under stress or with inadequate information. The environment can also represent any missing trainees within the scenario, which provides the potential to offer a completely autonomous facility for scenario design and test, and potentially a decision support facility, based on a build-up of empirical evidence from real world and training situations. In summary, the Pandora system integrates its computational intelligence, with the intelligence of the trainer and the trainees, to provide an emotionally engaging, augmented reality/virtual reality training environment for crisis managers.

[1]  P. Northouse Leadership: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[2]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[3]  J. Salgado The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  J. Zinn Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty , 2008 .

[5]  Andries Petrus Engelbrecht,et al.  Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence , 2005 .

[6]  Cornelia Boldyreff,et al.  Cost-effective virtual world development for serious games , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC).

[7]  D. Funder The Personality Puzzle , 1996 .

[8]  Ronald A. Ash,et al.  Selecting Employees for Fit: Personality and Preferred Managerial Style , 2001 .

[9]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Emergent Robot Differentiation for Distributed Multi-Robot Task Allocation , 2004, DARS.

[10]  R. Behrens Art, Design and Gestalt Theory , 2017 .

[11]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Animal–robots collective intelligence , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  Lachlan MacKinnon,et al.  ALT-C 2011 Proceedings Papers: 0151 The Development of a Rich Multimedia Training Environment for Crisis Management: Using Emotional Affect to Enhance Learning. , 2011 .

[13]  P. Northouse Leadership theory and practice, 4th ed. , 2007 .

[14]  R. D. Clark Risk Taking in Groups: A Social Psychological Analysis , 1974 .

[15]  Lachlan MacKinnon,et al.  Tracking and influencing trainee emotions in a crisis-planning scenario , 2010 .

[16]  James C. Lester,et al.  Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[17]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: Algorithms to Develop a Collective Mental Map , 1999, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.