Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex

SummarySpatial response profiles to stationary and moving stimuli and spatial frequency tuning curves to drifting sinusoidal gratings were recorded from a series of cells in the simple family. The spatial response profiles were recorded both to stationary flashing bars and sinusoidal gratings as well as to light and dark bars and edges and gratings moving at the optimal velocity. On the assumption that cells in the simple family operate linearly, spatial response profiles recorded experimentally were compared with those predicted by inverse Fourier transformation of the spatial frequency tuning curves. Conversely, the spatial frequency tuning curves recorded experimentally were compared with those predicted from the response profiles to moving and stationary stimuli. As a result of these comparisons, it is clear that moving stimuli provide a more accurate estimate of the spatial organization of the receptive field than do stationary stimuli. Cells with the higher optimal spatial frequencies tended to have narrower bandwidths. The simple cell with the narrowest bandwidth (0.94 octave) had five, and possibly six, subregions in the spatial response profile to moving light and dark bars, the largest number of subregions we encountered.

[1]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  INHIBITORY AND SUBLIMINAL EXCITATORY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NON-DOMINANT EYE TO THE RECEPTIVE FIELD OF BINOCULARLY-ACTIVATED NEURONS IN THE STRIATE CORTEX OF THE CAT , 1969 .

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Inhibitory and sub-liminal excitatory receptive fields of simple units in cat striate cortex. , 1969, Vision research.

[7]  G. H. Henry,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF SINGLE UNITS IN CAT STRIATE CORTEX , 1969 .

[8]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Responses to visual contours: spatio‐temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Spatial arrangement of line, edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. , 1973, Vision research.

[10]  R. M. Shapley,et al.  Edge detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Proceedings: Lateral interaction in the detection of composite spatial patterns. , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of striate cortical neurones , 1975, Nature.

[15]  P E King-Smith,et al.  The detection of gratings by independent activation of line detectors. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  N. Graham.  Visual detection of aperiodic spatial stimuli by probability summation among narrowband channels , 1977, Vision Research.

[18]  P E King-Smith,et al.  Analysis of the Detection of a Moving Line , 1978, Perception.

[19]  H. Wilson.  Quantitative prediction of line spread function measurements: Implications for channel bandwidths , 1978, Vision Research.

[20]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Cortical cells ; Bar and edge detectors, or spatial frequency filters , 1978 .

[21]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  L. Maffei,et al.  Spatial Frequency Channels: Neural Mechanisms , 1978 .

[23]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Variation in the spatial frequency selectivity of neurones in the cat visual cortex [proceedings]. , 1979, Journal of Physiology.

[25]  E. Yund,et al.  Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  D. Pollen,et al.  Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Strife over visual cortical function , 1981, Nature.

[28]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  silent periodic cells in the cat striate cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Non-linearities of temporal summation in neurones in area 17 of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial arrangements of responses by cells in the cat visual cortex to light and dark bars and edges , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Theory of spatial position and spatial frequency relations in the receptive fields of simple cells in the visual cortex , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  D. Mackay,et al.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  J. J. Kulikowski,et al.  Fourier analysis and spatial representation in the visual cortex , 1981, Experientia.