Analysis of sensory coding with complex stimuli

Most high-level sensory neurons have complex, nonlinear response properties; a comprehensive characterization of these properties remains a formidable challenge. Recent studies using complex sensory stimuli combined with linear and nonlinear analyses have provided new insights into the neuronal response properties in various sensory circuits.

[1]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[2]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[3]  A Tubis,et al.  Wiener kernel analysis of inner ear function in the American bullfrog. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[7]  H. Barlow.  Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  F. Dodge,et al.  Deciphering a neural code for vision. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[10]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF OPTIC NERVE FIBERS , 1940 .

[11]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Temporal dynamics of chromatic tuning in macaque primary visual cortex , 1998, Nature.

[12]  E. Lewis,et al.  Predicting the temporal responses of non-phase-locking bullfrog auditory units to complex acoustic waveforms , 1999, Hearing Research.

[13]  A M Aertsen,et al.  Reverse-correlation methods in auditory research , 1983, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[14]  D Margoliash,et al.  Parametric modeling of the temporal dynamics of neuronal responses using connectionist architectures. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Neural activity in areas V1, V2 and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing. , 1998, Neuroreport.

[16]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Neural activity in areas V1, V2 and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing , 1998, Neuroreport.

[17]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  J. Movshon,et al.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[20]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Asymmetric Suppression Outside the Classical Receptive Field of the Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Pollen,et al.  Complex cell response depends on interslit spacing. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[23]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons. , 1998, Science.

[25]  S. W. Kuffler.  Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Desimone,et al.  Predicting responses of nonlinear neurons in monkey striate cortex to complex patterns , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[28]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Relating cluster and population responses to natural sounds and tonal stimuli in cat primary auditory cortex , 2001, Hearing Research.

[29]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[33]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[34]  D. Pollen,et al.  Space-time spectra of complex cell filters in the macaque monkey: A comparison of results obtained with pseudowhite noise and grating stimuli , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[35]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Liberman.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[38]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[39]  G B Stanley,et al.  Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  R. Shapley,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of cat retinal ganglion cells in the frequency domain. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  W. Bialek,et al.  Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.