A new statistical approach for quantifying change in series of retinal and optic nerve head topography images.

PURPOSE To describe and evaluate new statistical techniques for detecting topographic changes in series of retinal and optic nerve head images acquired by scanning laser tomography (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph [HRT]; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). METHODS Proven quantitative techniques, collectively referred to as statistic image mapping (SIM), are widely used in neuroimaging. These techniques are applied to HRT images. A pixel-by-pixel analysis of topographic height over time yields a statistic image that is generated by using permutation testing, derives significance limits for change wholly from the patient's own data, and removes the need for reference data sets. These novel techniques were compared to the Topographic Change Analysis (TCA super-pixel analysis) available in the current HRT software, by means of an extensive series of computer experiments. The SIM and TCA techniques were further tested and compared to linear regression of rim area (RA) against time, in real longitudinal HRT series of eyes of 20 normal subjects and 30 ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients that were known to have converted to glaucoma, on the basis of visual field criteria. RESULTS Computer simulation indicated that SIM has better diagnostic precision at detecting change. In the real longitudinal series, SIM flagged false-positive structural progression in two (10%) of normal subjects, whereas TCA identified three (15%), and linear regression of RA against time identified two (10%). SIM identified 22 (73%) of the OHT converters as having structural progression, whereas the TCA and linear regression of RA against time each identified 16 (53%) over the course of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS SIM has better diagnostic precision in detecting change in series of HRT images when compared to current quantitative techniques. The clinical utility of these techniques will be established on further longitudinal data sets.

[1]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  R A Hitchings,et al.  The optic disc in glaucoma: pathogenetic correlation of five patterns of cupping in chronic open-angle glaucoma. , 1976, Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[3]  W Adler,et al.  Simulation based analysis of automated, classification of medical images. , 2004, Methods of information in medicine.

[4]  RBalwantray C. Chauhan,et al.  Influence of Time Separation on Variability Estimates of Topographic Measurements with Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[5]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[6]  B Schwartz.  The optic disc in glaucoma: introduction. , 1976, Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[7]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  N. Swindale,et al.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  P A Sample,et al.  Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[11]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Glaucomatous optic disc changes in the contralateral eye of unilateral normal pressure glaucoma patients. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[12]  S. Drance,et al.  The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. , 1997, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[13]  H. Schroder,et al.  Confocal Laser Tomographic Scanning Of The Eye , 1989, Optics & Photonics.

[14]  F W Fitzke,et al.  Use of sequential Heidelberg retina tomograph images to identify changes at the optic disc in ocular hypertensive patients at risk of developing glaucoma , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Roger A Hitchings,et al.  Optimizing and validating an approach for identifying glaucomatous change in optic nerve topography. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  P. Good,et al.  Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses , 1995 .

[17]  J. Katz,et al.  Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  K Rohrschneider,et al.  Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[20]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  S M Drance,et al.  The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Comparison of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Retinal Thickness Analyzer in the assessment of diabetic macular edema. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  Drance Sm,et al.  Optic disc in glaucoma. , 1975 .

[25]  A C Viswanathan,et al.  Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  Thomas Martin Deserno,et al.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  M. Niknian,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1993 .

[28]  L Brigatti,et al.  Regional test-retest variability of confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Balwantray C. Chauhan,et al.  Effect of the cardiac cycle on topographic measurements using confocal scanning laser tomography , 1995, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[32]  R A Hitchings,et al.  Optic disc changes following trabeculectomy: longitudinal and localisation of change , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  B. Manly.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[36]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[37]  B. C. Chauhan.  Confocal scanning laser tomography , 1996 .

[38]  N. Swindale,et al.  Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to Detect Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[39]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Statistical analysis of medical data : new developments , 2000 .

[41]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Tests for Comparing Images Based on Randomization and Permutation Methods , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[42]  Roger A Hitchings,et al.  Approach for identifying glaucomatous optic nerve progression by scanning laser tomography. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 2003, Ophthalmology.