A Data Collection of Infants’ Visual, Physical, and Behavioral Reactions to a Small Humanoid Robot

Exploratory movements during infancy help typically developing infants learn the connections between their own actions and desired outcomes. In contrast, infants who are at risk for developmental delays often have neuromotor impairments that negatively influence their motivation for movement. The goal of this work is to expand our understanding of infant responses to non-contact interactions with a small humanoid robot. In the initial work presented here, we focus on understanding how this type of robotic system might help to encourage typically developing infant motor exploration. A data collection with N=9 infants compared infant reactions to four robot conditions: saying “yay” with arm movement, saying “kick” with leg movement, saying “yay” with no movement, and saying “kick” with no movement. The results indicate that infants visually gazed at the robot while it moved, looking specifically to the part of the robot that was moving. Infants tended to move more during periods of robot inactivity. When the robot was moving, the infants also seemed more alert. Overall, these results can inform future studies of how to develop interventions to encourage movement practice by typically developing and at-risk infants.

[1]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[2]  H. Hayne,et al.  The development of declarative memory in human infants: age-related changes in deferred imitation. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Mohamad A Mikati,et al.  Care for child development: basic science rationale and effects of interventions. , 2011, Pediatric neurology.

[4]  J. Gould,et al.  Missed Opportunities in the Referral of High-Risk Infants to Early Intervention , 2012, Pediatrics.

[5]  Maja J Matarić,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation , 2007 .

[6]  E. Gibson,et al.  An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development , 2000 .

[7]  A. Meltzoff Infant Imitation After a 1-Week Delay: Long-Term Memory for Novel Acts and Multiple Stimuli. , 1988, Developmental psychology.

[8]  Michele A Lobo,et al.  Assessment and stability of early learning abilities in preterm and full-term infants across the first two years of life. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[9]  C. Robinson,et al.  Part C Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers: Percentage Eligible Versus Served , 2013, Pediatrics.

[10]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The effect of presence on human-robot interaction , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[11]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains , 2012, CogSci.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change , 1994 .

[13]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  Daily Quantity of Infant Leg Movement: Wearable Sensor Algorithm and Relationship to Walking Onset , 2015, Sensors.

[14]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[15]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[16]  H. Hayne,et al.  Developmental changes in deferred imitation by 6- to 24-month-old infants , 1996 .

[17]  Gisa Aschersleben,et al.  Infant's perception of goal-directed actions performed by a mechanical device , 2005 .

[18]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  The development of imitation in infancy , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Darrah,et al.  Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant , 1994 .

[20]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Computer Tutors: Solving the Two-Sigma Problem , 2001, User Modeling.

[21]  Harlene Hayne,et al.  The development of declarative memory in human infants: age-related changes in deferred imitation. , 2000 .

[22]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Development of infants’ attention to faces during the first year , 2009, Cognition.

[23]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  The economics of infancy: a review of conjugate reinforcement. , 1979, Advances in child development and behavior.

[24]  A. Leslie Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[25]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Infant Exploratory Learning: Influence on Leg Joint Coordination , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  Gehan Roberts,et al.  Rates of early intervention services in very preterm children with developmental disabilities at age 2 years , 2008, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[27]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Graded cueing feedback in robot-mediated imitation practice for children with autism spectrum disorders , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[28]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Infant discrimination of humanoid robots , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Harlene Hayne,et al.  It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Older siblings facilitate imitation during infancy , 2003 .

[30]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Potentiation in young infants: The origin of the prior knowledge effect? , 2011, Memory & cognition.