Surrogate multi-fidelity data and model fusion forscientific discovery and uncertainty quantification inEarth System Models

This whitepaper addresses the Earth and Environmental Systems Sciences Division (EESSD)’s predictability challenges in modeling the integrated water cycle and data-model integration. Specifically, it focuses on reducing and characterizing the uncertainty in the representation of process models for unresolved physics, either due to model resolution or limited by the physical understanding or computational efficiency, and the use of observational data for in-situ process parameter optimization within ESM. The described methods may also be used to determine the nature of responses (e.g. strength and direction), and hence to identify critical processes that drive the overall ESM responses to perturbation in the forcing

[1]  D. Resio,et al.  Inconsistent Spectral Evolution in Operational Wave Models due to Inaccurate Specification of Nonlinear Interactions , 2019, Journal of Physical Oceanography.

[2]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Evaluating Parameterizations in General Circulation Models: Climate Simulation Meets Weather Prediction , 2004 .

[4]  C. Bretherton,et al.  DNS and LES for Simulating Stratocumulus: Better Together , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[5]  S. A. Klein,et al.  Assessment of Precipitating Marine Stratocumulus Clouds in the E3SMv1 Atmosphere Model: A Case Study from the ARM MAGIC Field Campaign , 2020 .

[6]  Ashesh Chattopadhyay,et al.  Analog forecasting of extreme-causing weather patterns using deep learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[7]  Prabhat,et al.  Application of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Detecting Extreme Weather in Climate Datasets , 2016, ArXiv.

[8]  Prasanna Balaprakash,et al.  Recurrent Neural Network Architecture Search for Geophysical Emulation , 2020, SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[9]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[10]  Sebastian Scher,et al.  Toward Data‐Driven Weather and Climate Forecasting: Approximating a Simple General Circulation Model With Deep Learning , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[12]  Scott Lundberg,et al.  A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , 2017, NIPS.

[13]  Hui Wan,et al.  Parametric Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification in the Version 1 of E3SM Atmosphere Model Based on Short Perturbed Parameter Ensemble Simulations , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[14]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[15]  Andreas C. Damianou,et al.  Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science , 2019, Nature.