The assessment of the attractiveness of process facilities to terrorist attacks

Abstract Acts of interference against facilities of the process industry might result in severe consequences in case of a successful attack (major explosions, fires, toxic dispersions or environmental contamination). Although protection measures are usually in place to resist intrusion and process industry sites are mostly well equipped to meet emergencies, the security of industrial sites, and in particular of chemical and petro-chemical facilities, has become a matter of increasing concern in recent years. In the present study, a semi-quantitative methodology for the assessment of industrial facilities attractiveness with respect to malicious acts of interference was presented. The methodology considers two main aspects as targeting incentives. The first is related to the plant hazard potential, i.e. the potential of causing severe damage to population in case of successful attack leading to a major accident in the facility. The second aspect is the perceived value that a target may have for a specific threat. A set of relevant specification elements influencing the targeting logic were identified, considering socio-political and strategic elements, and scoring criteria were established to estimate the attractiveness increase due to the perceived value of the target to the threat. A set of case studies, drawn on the features of existing installations, was used to exemplify the procedure for attractiveness assessment. The methodology demonstrated the importance of considering both technical and socio-political aspects, as well as ideological and strategic incentives to an attack, for a holistic determination of plant attractiveness.

[1]  Hans-Joachim Uth Combating interference by unauthorised persons , 2005 .

[2]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Assessment of lightning impact frequency for process equipment , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  C. Jochum Can Chemical Plants be Protected Against Terrorist Attacks , 2005 .

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Preparing for major terrorist attacks against chemical clusters: Intelligently planning protection measures w.r.t. domino effects , 2014 .

[6]  Kirsten Rasmussen Natural events and accidents with hazardous materials , 1995 .

[7]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Application of a multi-plant QRA: A case study investigating the risk impact of the construction of a new plant on an existing chemical plant's risk levels , 2013 .

[8]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for atmospheric storage tanks , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The description of population vulnerability in quantitative risk analysis. , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[11]  R. Pape,et al.  The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Dipak K. Gupta,et al.  Exploring Roots of Terrorism , 2005 .

[13]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area , 2009 .

[14]  Lina Balluz,et al.  Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Gabriele Landucci,et al.  Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Morgan M. Bliss,et al.  Compliance of Community Hospitals with the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) in the Western United States , 2013 .

[18]  Ashwani Srivastava,et al.  New methodologies for security risk assessment of oil and gas industry , 2010 .

[19]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas , 2014 .

[20]  Jai P. Gupta,et al.  Site Security: for Chemical Process Industries , 2011 .

[21]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A framework for the system-of-systems analysis of the risk for a safety-critical plant exposed to external events , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Other Causes of Escalation , 2013 .

[23]  P S Showalter,et al.  Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980-1989: analysis and recommendations. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Andrea Bettini Il Sole 24 Ore , 2009 .

[25]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents , 2005 .

[26]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis , 2003 .