Using work domain analysis to evaluate the impact of technological change on the performance of complex socio-technical systems

Complex socio-technical systems are notoriously difficult to evaluate. The relationships between measurable processes and high-level descriptions of performance are neither clear nor well understood. Consequently, it is extremely difficult to relate changes made to physical components to overall system performance. Using the relationships captured in work domain analysis, this paper introduces a new approach for evaluating the impact of system changes. An event and actor-independent model is used to describe the given domain at a number of levels of abstraction. The relationship between these descriptions forms the basis of this approach. A case study of a recently upgraded UK land military headquarters is used to demonstrate the approach. As the presented case study will show, a clear link can be made between system changes that result in an increase in overall system performance, as well as changes that result in a degradation. It is contended that the described approach adds important structure to the way that evaluations of complex socio-technical systems are considered, creating a traceable link between changes made at a component level to high-order descriptions of domain purpose.

[1]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Studying Cognitive Systems in Context: Preface to the Special Section , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Ecological Interface Design , 2004 .

[3]  Brian M Kleiner Macroegonomics: work system analysis and design. , 2008, Human factors.

[4]  Sally A. Seven,et al.  Selecting Performance Measures: "Objective" versus "Subjective" Measurement , 1992 .

[5]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Using Work Domain Analysis to Evaluate the Impact of Digitization on Command and Control , 2008 .

[7]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Using Cognitive Work Analysis to Develop a Capability for the Evaluation of Future Systems* , 2003 .

[8]  Linda J. Sorensen,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Coping with Complexity , 2010 .

[9]  A. Shepherd,et al.  Hierarchical Task Analysis and Training Decisions. , 1985 .

[10]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[11]  Wei Xu,et al.  Identifying Problems and Generating Recommendations for Enhancing Complex Systems: Applying the Abstraction Hierarchy Framework as an Analytical Tool , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[12]  David Meister,et al.  Behavioral Analysis and Measurement Methods , 1985 .

[13]  Neelam Naikar,et al.  Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: An approach for training technical skills in error management , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[14]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  The tactical Tomahawk conundrum: designing decision support systems for revolutionary domains , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[15]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  A work domain model to support shipboard command and control , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[16]  Tab Lamoureux,et al.  Control Task Analysis for Applied Settings , 2006 .

[17]  Brian M. Kleiner,et al.  Macroergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD) of Work System Processes , 2002 .

[18]  Lawrence G. Shattuck,et al.  SITUATION AWARENESS REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FUTURE OBJECTIVE FORCE , 2003 .

[19]  D. P. Jenkins,et al.  Applying cognitive work analysis to the design of rapidly reconfigurable interfaces in complex networks , 2008 .

[20]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Evaluating Design Proposals for Complex Systems with Work Domain Analysis , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Designing Teams for First-of-a-Kind, Complex Systems Using the Initial Phases of Cognitive Work Analysis: Case Study , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  The Development of a Cognitive Work Analysis Tool , 2007, HCI.

[25]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[26]  Brian M. Kleiner,et al.  Macroergonomics: Work System Analysis and Design , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[27]  M. S. Young,et al.  Using cognitive work analysis to explore activity allocation within military domains , 2008, Ergonomics.

[28]  David Crone Selecting Sensitive Measures of Performance in Complex Multivariable Environments , 2007 .

[29]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  HITOP-A. A tool to facilitate interdisciplinary manufacturing systems design , 1992 .