Interocular suppression in the visual cortex of strabismic cats

Strabismic humans usually experience powerful suppression of vision in the nonfixating eye. In an attempt to demonstrate physiological correlates of such suppression, we recorded from the primary visual cortex of cats with surgically induced squint and studied the responses of neurons to drifting gratings of different orientation, spatial frequency, and contrast in the two eyes. Only 1 of 50 apparently monocular cells showed any evidence of remaining, subliminal excitatory input from the “silent” eye when the two eyes were stimulated with gratings of similar orientation, and even among the small proportion of cells that remained binocularly driven, very few exhibited facilitation when stimulated binocularly. The majority of cells from both exotropes and esotropes, even those that could be independently driven through either eye, displayed nonspecific interocular suppression: stimulation of the nondominant eye with a drifting grating of any orientation depressed the response to an optimal grating being presented to the dominant eye. This phenomenon exhibited a gross nonlinearity in that it was dependent on the temporal sequence of stimulus presentation: stimulation of the nondominant eye caused significant suppression only if the neuron was already responding to an appropriate stimulus in the dominant eye, but not when onset of stimulation in the two eyes was simultaneous. Interocular suppression was always independent of the relative spatial phase of the two grating stimuli, and usually broadly tuned for the spatial frequency of the suppressive stimulus. Suppression may depend on inhibitory interaction between neighboring ocular dominance columns, combined with the loss of conventional disparity-selective binocular interactions for matched stimuli in the two eyes. The similarity of interocular suppression in strabismic cats and that caused by orthogonal gratings in the two eyes in normal cats (Sengpiel and Blakemore, 1994; Sengpiel et al., 1994) suggests that strabismic suppression and binocular rivalry depend on similar neural mechanisms.

[1]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Interocular control of neuronal responsiveness in cat visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[2]  S. R. Lehky.  An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[3]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: Consequence of long-term interocular suppression , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  C Ware,et al.  On interocular transfer of various visual aftereffects in normal and stereoblind observers. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  Y. Chino,et al.  Effects of rearing kittens with convergent strabismus on development of receptive-field properties in striate cortex neurons. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Plasticity in the binocular correspondence of striate cortical receptive fields in kittens. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans , 1977, Vision Research.

[11]  P. D. Spear,et al.  Response properties of striate cortex neurons in cats raised with divergent or convergent strabismus. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R. C. Van Sluyters,et al.  Experimental strabismus in the kitten. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  C. Schor,et al.  Visual Stimuli for Strabismic Suppression , 1977, Perception.

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Squint Affects Synchronization of Oscillatory Responses in Cat Visual Cortex , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Amblyopia and suppression in binocular cortical neurones of strabismic cat. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[16]  J. Wolter.  System of Ophthalmology, Vol. VI: Ocular Motility and Strabismus , 1974 .

[17]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Monocularly deprived cats: binocular tests of cortical cells reveal functional connections from the deprived eye , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction on monocularly discharged lateral geniculate and striate neurons in the cat. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  W. Singer,et al.  Selection of intrinsic horizontal connections in the visual cortex by correlated neuronal activity. , 1992, Science.

[22]  C. Bruce,et al.  Binocular differences in cortical receptive fields of kittens after rotationally disparate binocular experience. , 1977, Science.

[23]  J A Movshon,et al.  Interocular Transfer in Normal Humans, and Those Who Lack Stereopsis , 1972, Perception.

[24]  F. Wörgötter,et al.  Quantification and Comparison of Cell Properties in Cat's Striate Cortex Determined by Different Types of Stimuli , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  U. Leonards,et al.  Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: The effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Squint‐induced Modification of Visual Receptive Field in the Lateral Suprasylvian Cortex of the Cat: Binocul Interaction, Vertical Effect and Anomalous Correspondence , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  D M Levi,et al.  The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  W. Singer,et al.  Squint affects striate cortex cells encoding horizontal image movements , 1979, Brain Research.

[29]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Patterns of Local Connectivity in the Neocortex , 1993, Neural Computation.

[30]  R Blake,et al.  Clinical suppression and amblyopia. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  R. Sireteanu.  Binocular vision in strabismic humans with alternating fixation , 1982, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  P. Somogyi,et al.  Synaptic connections of morphologically identified and physiologically characterized large basket cells in the striate cortex of cat , 1983, Neuroscience.

[35]  K. Wybar,et al.  System of Ophthalmology, Vol. 6 - Ocular Motility and Strabismus , 1973 .

[36]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  R. Freeman,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of convergent and divergent strabismus in the cat: electrical and visual activation of single cortical cells. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Douglas,et al.  A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  M. Grünau.  Binocular summation and the binocularity of cat visual cortex , 1979, Vision Research.

[40]  R. Blake,et al.  On the site of strabismic suppression. , 1976, Investigative ophthalmology.

[41]  U. Yinon,et al.  The ocular dominance of cortical neurons in cats developed with divergent and convergent squint , 1975, Vision Research.

[42]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Residual binocular interaction in stereoblind humans , 1980, Vision Research.

[43]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  D M Levi,et al.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation. , 1979, Science.

[45]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Briefly Presented Stimuli Can Disrupt Constant Suppression and Binocular Rivalry Suppression , 1986, Perception.

[46]  R. Hess.  Interocular Transfer in Individuals with Strabismic Amblyopia; A Cautionary Note , 1978, Perception.

[47]  R. Blake.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  F. Duffy,et al.  Animal models of strabismic amblyopia: physiological studies of visual cortex and the lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1982, Brain research.

[49]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  R. Hess.  The site and nature of suppression in squint amblyopia , 1991, Vision Research.