Static single-arm force generation with kinematic constraints

Smooth, frictionless, kinematic constraints on the motion of a grasped object reduce the motion freedoms at the hand, but add force freedoms, that is, force directions that do not affect the motion of the object. We are studying how subjects make use of these force freedoms in static and dynamic manipulation tasks. In this study, subjects were asked to use their right hand to hold stationary a manipulandum being pulled with constant force along a low-friction linear rail. To accomplish this task, subjects had to apply an equal and opposite force along the rail, but subjects were free to apply a force against the constraint, orthogonal to the pulling force. Although constraint forces increase the magnitude of the total force vector at the hand and have no effect on the task, we found that subjects applied significant constraint forces in a consistent manner dependent on the arm and constraint configurations. We show that these results can be interpreted in terms of an objective function describing how subjects choose a particular hand force from an infinite set of hand forces that accomplish the task. Without assuming any particular form for the objective function, the data show that its level sets are convex and scale invariant (i.e., the level set shapes are independent of the hand-force magnitude). We derive the level sets, or "isocost" contours, of subjects' objective functions directly from the experimental data.

[1]  S. Delp,et al.  The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  H E Veeger,et al.  Quasi-static analysis of muscle forces in the shoulder mechanism during wheelchair propulsion. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  A mechanical analysis of force distribution between redundant, multiple degree-of-freedom actuators in the human: Implications for the central nervous system , 1994 .

[5]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism. , 1994 .

[6]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Motion Guides for Assisted Manipulation , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[9]  Joseph D. Towles,et al.  Quantification of fingertip force reduction in the forefinger following simulated paralysis of extensor and intrinsic muscles. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  A. Bahill,et al.  Determining ideal baseball bat weights using muscle force-velocity relationships , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Is coordination of two-joint leg muscles during load lifting consistent with the strategy of minimum fatigue? , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Dealing with constraints: a biomechanical approach , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[14]  W.Z. Rymer,et al.  Role of intrinsic muscle properties in producing smooth movements , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  S C Jacobsen,et al.  Quantitation of human shoulder anatomy for prosthetic arm control--I. Surface modelling. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  B. P. Yeo Investigations concerning the principle of minimal total muscular force. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[19]  H. Gomi Anisotropic stiffness reduction during constrained multijoint arm movement , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[20]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Zhiwei Luo,et al.  Towards understanding of human movements constrained by the external environment , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[22]  D J Ostry,et al.  Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R. L. Linscheid,et al.  Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P. Crago,et al.  A dynamic model for simulating movements of the elbow, forearm, an wrist. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A G Feldman,et al.  Moment arms and lengths of human upper limb muscles as functions of joint angles. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Alexander Rm,et al.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. , 1997 .

[27]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Static single-arm force generation with kinematic constraints , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[29]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Kinematic constraints for assisted single-arm manipulation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[30]  P. Crago,et al.  Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The control of stable postures in the multijoint arm , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  T. Milner Contribution of geometry and joint stiffness to mechanical stability of the human arm , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Controlling the apparent inertia of passive human-interactive robots , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[36]  Stan C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  W. L. Nelson Physical principles for economies of skilled movements , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[38]  Brian A. Garner,et al.  Estimation of Musculotendon Properties in the Human Upper Limb , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.