The Defensive Dimension of the Battle against Terrorism - An Analysis of Management of Terror Incidents in Jerusalem

The appearance of suicide terrorism in the streets of Israel's cities in the early 1990s demonstrated the changes in the characteristics of terrorism, which Israel and many other countries have had to contend with. The shift in the nature of terrorism has had clear ramifications for the way democratic nations counter terrorism and shows that there is a need to focus not only on active offensive methods but, at the same time, to develop defensive methods of dealing with a terror attack. The current study tackles this challenge by introducing a general model, indicating the significant principles of the defensive dimension of countering terrorism. The second part of the study will focus on one of the stages of the model, the management of the terror event, and present a number of salient variables affecting successful implementation. The last part of the study tests the theoretical assumptions by analyzing how Israel has coped with terror event management during suicide attacks in Jerusalem, and empirically evaluate which secondary factors determine management effectiveness during a terror event. The findings emphasize the importance of internal coordination among units operating at the scene, external coordination among municipal bodies and the clarity of the initial description of the situation as important factors in effective management of terror events.

[1]  M. Crenshaw.  Why America? The Globalization of Civil War , 2001 .

[2]  J. Stevenson.  Pragmatic Counter-terrorism , 2001 .

[3]  William L. Waugh,et al.  Regionalizing Emergency Management: Counties as State and Local Government , 1994 .

[4]  L. Donohue.  In the Name of National Security: US Counterterrorist Measures, 1960-2000 , 2001 .

[5]  I. Sharkansky.  Policy making in Israel : routines for simple problems and coping with the complex , 1997 .

[6]  Ashton B. Carter,et al.  The Architecture of Government in the Face of Terrorism , 2001, International Security.

[7]  Alice Hills.  Responding to Catastrophic Terrorism , 2002 .

[8]  Robert J. Corber,et al.  Queer Studies , 2022, The SAGE Handbook of Marxism.

[9]  David Tucker,et al.  What is New about the New Terrorism and How Dangerous is It? , 2001 .

[10]  W. Laqueur.  The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction , 1999 .

[11]  D. Benjamin,et al.  America and the new terrorism , 2000 .

[12]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Emergency Operations Centres in an Era of Terrorism: Policy and Management Functions , 2003 .

[13]  Peter K. Eisinger,et al.  The American City in the Age of Terror , 2004 .

[14]  U. Rosenthal,et al.  September 11: Public Administration and the Study of Crises and Crisis Management , 2003 .

[15]  Laura K. Donohue,et al.  Federalism and the Battle over Counterterrorist Law: State Sovereignty, Criminal Law Enforcement, and National Security , 2002 .

[16]  Alex P. Schmid,et al.  Western responses to terrorism: A twenty‐five year balance sheet , 1992 .

[17]  B. Hoffman,et al.  Al Qaeda, Trends in Terrorism, and Future Potentialities: An Assessment , 2003, Transnational Terrorism.

[18]  W. Laqueur,et al.  The New Terrorism , 2001 .

[19]  S. Simon.  The New Terrorism: Securing the Nation against a Messianic Foe , 2003 .

[20]  Ami Pedahzur,et al.  The War on Terrorism and the Decline of Terrorist Group Formation: A Research Note , 2002 .

[21]  R. Pape,et al.  The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism , 2003, American Political Science Review.