Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Thagard,et al. Coherence in Thought and Action , 2000 .
[2] Mark T. Keane,et al. A Model of Plausibility , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[3] Dale T. Miller,et al. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .
[4] J. J. Williams,et al. The hazards of explanation: overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[5] J. Piaget,et al. The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .
[6] Jason E. Albrecht,et al. Updating a situation model: a memory-based text processing view. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] M. Pezzo,et al. Making sense of failure: A motivated model of hindsight bias. , 2007 .
[8] Danielle S. McNamara,et al. Training Self Explanation and Reading Strategies , 1999 .
[9] Melody Dye,et al. Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task. , 2013, Child development.
[10] D. Schkade,et al. Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias , 1991 .
[11] N. Tsang. Surprise in Social Work Education , 2013 .
[12] Edward Munnich,et al. Can Causal Sense-Making Benefit Foresight, Rather than Biasing Hindsight? , 2014, CogSci.
[13] G. Rainer,et al. Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[14] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. , 1995 .
[15] R. Nisbett,et al. Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[16] D. McNamara. Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[17] S. Carey,et al. Functional explanation and the function of explanation , 2006, Cognition.
[18] T. Lombrozo. Explanation and Abductive Inference , 2012 .
[19] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[20] D. Mandel. Effect of counterfactual and factual thinking on causal judgements , 2003 .
[21] John E. Laird,et al. The Soar Cognitive Architecture , 2012 .
[22] David Mazursky,et al. Does a surprising outcome reinforce or reverse the hindsight bias , 1997 .
[23] Roger C. Schank,et al. Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively , 1986 .
[24] T. Trabasso,et al. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.
[25] R. Reisenzein. Exploring the Strength of Association between the Components of Emotion Syndromes: The Case of Surprise , 2000 .
[26] Ruth Wylie,et al. The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014 .
[27] P N Johnson-Laird,et al. Hidden conflicts: explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect. , 2012, Acta psychologica.
[28] Derek Partridge,et al. Surprisingness and Expectation Failure: What's the Difference? , 1987, IJCAI.
[29] Stefan L. Frank,et al. Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .
[30] Boris Egloff,et al. Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[31] Mark T. Keane,et al. Surprise: Disconfirmed expectations or representation-fit? , 2006 .
[32] Linda L. Carli. Cognitive Reconstruction, Hindsight, and Reactions to Victims and Perpetrators , 1999 .
[33] A. Tversky,et al. The simulation heuristic , 1982 .
[34] W. Meyer,et al. Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions: The Case of Surprise , 1997 .
[35] Mark T. Keane,et al. A Computational Theory of Subjective Probability [Featuring a Proof that the Conjunction Effect is not a Fallacy] , 2013, CogSci.
[36] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[37] P. Ekman,et al. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[38] Mark T. Keane. Constraints on Analogical Mapping: A Comparison of Three Models , 1994, Cogn. Sci..
[39] Walter Kintsch,et al. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .
[40] Michelene T. H. Chi,et al. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..
[41] Rainer Reisenzein,et al. The Role of Surprise in the Attribution Process , 1995 .
[42] Michel Manago,et al. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning , 1994, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[43] J. Turner. Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory , 2007 .
[44] Roger C. Schank,et al. Inside case-based explanation , 1994, Artificial intelligence series.
[45] Mark T. Keane,et al. Surprise! You've Got Some Explaining to Do , 2013, CogSci.
[46] Rainer Reisenzein,et al. On the expression and experience of surprise: no evidence for facial feedback, but evidence for a reverse self-inference effect. , 2007, Emotion.
[47] F. Keil,et al. Explanation and understanding , 2015 .
[48] Michelene T. H. Chi,et al. Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .
[49] Derek J. Koehler,et al. Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.
[50] Jeffrey Loewenstein,et al. The Repetition-Break Plot Structure: A Cognitive Influence on Selection in the Marketplace of Ideas , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[51] A. Schützwohl,et al. Surprise and schema strength , 1998 .
[52] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[53] A. Ortony,et al. What's basic about basic emotions? , 1990, Psychological review.
[54] J. J. Williams,et al. Why does explaining help learning? Insight from an explanation impairment effect , 2010 .
[55] Mark T. Keane,et al. Making sense of surprise: an investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[56] Ruth M. J. Byrne,et al. Semifactual “even if” thinking , 2002 .
[57] L. Macedo. The Practical Advantage of Surprise-based Agents (Extended Abstract) , 2010 .
[58] Robert Michael Young,et al. Suspense? Surprise! or How to Generate Stories with Surprise Endings by Exploiting the Disparity of Knowledge between a Story's Reader and Its Characters , 2009, ICIDS.
[59] M. Pezzo,et al. Surprise, defence, or making sense: What removes hindsight bias? , 2003, Memory.
[60] D. Stahlberg,et al. The Role of Surprise in Hindsight Bias: A Metacognitive Model of Reduced and Reversed Hindsight Bias , 2007 .
[61] Susan T. Dumais,et al. How come you know so much? From practical problem to theory , 1996 .
[62] Morteza Dehghani,et al. Causal Explanation and Fact Mutability in Counterfactual Reasoning , 2012 .
[63] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.
[64] Susan T. Dumais,et al. The latent semantic analysis theory of knowledge , 1997 .
[65] Robert Michael Young,et al. A Use of Flashback and Foreshadowing for Surprise Arousal in Narrative Using a Plan-Based Approach , 2008, ICIDS.
[66] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. Two Decades of Structure Building. , 1997, Discourse processes.
[67] J. Tenenbaum,et al. From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries , 2007, Cognition.
[68] Reid Hastie,et al. Hindsight and Causality , 1991 .
[69] A. Cardoso. Creativity and Surprise , 2000 .
[70] Rainer Reisenzein,et al. Children’s and Adults’ Reactions to a Schema-discrepant Event: A Developmental Analysis of Surprise , 1999 .
[71] Benjamin Naumann. The Architecture Of Cognition , 2016 .
[72] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .
[73] David Leake,et al. Goal-Based Explanation Evaluation , 1991, Cogn. Sci..
[74] Pierre Baldi,et al. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.
[75] R. Byrne,et al. “If only” counterfactual thoughts about exceptional actions , 2011, Memory & cognition.
[76] James M. Olson,et al. Counterfactuals, Causal Attributions, and the Hindsight Bias: A Conceptual Integration , 1996 .
[77] Edward Munnich,et al. Surprise, Surprise: The Role of Surprising Numerical Feedback in Belief Change , 2007 .
[78] Gideon Keren,et al. When are successes more surprising than failures? , 2002 .
[79] F. Strack,et al. Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .
[80] John R. Anderson,et al. Rules of the Mind , 1993 .
[81] A. Cardoso,et al. Modeling Forms of Surprise in Artificial Agents: Empirical and Theoretical Study of Surprise Functions , 2004 .
[82] C. Darwin. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .
[83] T. Connolly. The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality (1st ed., 284 pp.). By R. M. J. Byrne. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005. ISBN 0‐262‐02584‐1 , 2008 .
[84] Guido H. E. Gendolla,et al. Surprise in the Context of Achievement: The Role of Outcome Valence and Importance , 1997 .
[85] Ruth Feldman,et al. On the origins of background emotions: from affect synchrony to symbolic expression. , 2007, Emotion.
[86] P. Johnson-Laird,et al. Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency. , 2004, Psychological review.
[87] Allen Newell,et al. SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..
[88] Ivan K. Ash,et al. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[89] R. Byrne,et al. Spontaneous counterfactual thoughts and causal explanations , 2006 .
[90] B. Love,et al. The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[91] N. Roese. Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.
[92] R. Byrne. Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[93] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .
[94] Alexandra Touroutoglou,et al. Cognitive Interruption as an Object of Metacognitive Monitoring: Feeling of Difficulty and Surprise , 2010 .
[95] J. Stainer,et al. The Emotions , 1882, Nature.
[96] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Harry Potter and the sorcerer's scope: latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning , 2011, Memory & cognition.
[97] Emiliano Lorini,et al. The Unexpected Aspects of Surprise , 2006, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..
[98] G. Wells,et al. Mental Simulation of Causality , 1989 .
[99] F. Heider. The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .
[100] Kelley Durkin,et al. The Self-Explanation Effect when Learning Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. , 2011 .
[101] Guido H. E. Gendolla,et al. Surprise and Motivation of Causal Search: How Are They Affected by Outcome Valence and Importance? , 2001 .
[102] D. Schön,et al. Emotional prosody: sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[103] Jordi Vallverdú,et al. Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics: New Applications in Affective Computing and Artificial Intelligence , 2009 .
[104] S. Tomkins,et al. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Positive Affects , 1963 .
[105] K. Teigen,et al. Surprises: low probabilities or high contrasts? , 2003, Cognition.
[106] Pierre Baldi,et al. Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention , 2010, Neural Networks.
[107] M. Gernsbacher. Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension : the structure building framework , 1991 .
[108] P. Silvia. Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. , 2009 .