Supervising Industrial Distributed Processes Through Soft Models, Deformation Metrics and Temporal Logic Rules

Typical control solutions for future industrial systems follows a top-down approach, where processes are completely defined at high-level by prosumers (managers) and, later, the control infrastructure decomposes, transforms and delegates the execution of the different parts and activities making up the process into the existing industrial physical components. This view, although may be adequate for certain scenarios; presents several problems when processes are executed by people (workers) or autonomous devices whose programming already describes and controls the activities they perform. On the one hand, people execute processes in a very variable manner. All these execution ways are valid although they can be very different from the original process definition. On the other hand, industrial autonomous devices cannot be requested to execute activities as desired, and their operations can only be supervised. In this context, new control solutions are needed. Therefore, in this paper it is proposed a new process supervision and control system, focused on industrial processes executed in a distributed manner by people and autonomous devices. The proposed solution includes a soft model for industrial processes, which are latter validated through deformation metrics (instead of traditional rigid indicators). Besides, in order to guarantee the coherence of all executions, temporal logic rules are also integrated to evaluate the development of the different activities. Finally, an experimental validation is also provided to analyze the performance of the proposed solution.

[1]  Borja Bordel,et al.  People-as-a-Service Dilemma: Humanizing Computing Solutions in High-Efficiency Applications , 2019, UCAmI.

[2]  Borja Bordel,et al.  A Two-Phase Algorithm for Recognizing Human Activities in the Context of Industry 4.0 and Human-Driven Processes , 2019, WorldCIST.

[3]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  A moving horizon approach to Networked Control system design , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Iain L. MacDonald,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Discrete-Valued Time Series , 2015 .

[5]  Hiroyuki Nakagawa,et al.  OPC (OLE for process control) specification and its developments , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st SICE Annual Conference. SICE 2002..

[6]  Dilip Patel,et al.  Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques , 2017, Comput. Secur..

[7]  Duo Li,et al.  Concept design for a Web-based supervisory control and data-acquisition (SCADA) system , 2002, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[8]  Kazuo Tanaka,et al.  Fuzzy control turns 50: 10 years later , 2015, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Hong Ye,et al.  Scheduling of networked control systems , 2001 .

[10]  Tai C Yang,et al.  Networked control system: a brief survey , 2006 .

[11]  Kevin Jones,et al.  A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems , 2016, Comput. Secur..

[12]  Muhammad Aslam,et al.  A new variable control chart using neutrosophic interval method-an application to automobile industry , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[13]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  Enabling Flexible and Continuous Capability Invocation in Mobile Prosumer Environments , 2012, Sensors.

[14]  Marjan Golob,et al.  Web-based control and process automation education and industry 4.0 , 2018 .

[15]  Golden G. Richard,et al.  SCADA Systems: Challenges for Forensic Investigators , 2012, Computer.

[16]  Stuart A. Boyer Scada: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition , 1993 .

[17]  Guang-Hong Yang,et al.  Event-triggered fuzzy control for nonlinear networked control systems , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Haider Abbas,et al.  Cloud-Assisted IoT-Based SCADA Systems Security: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2016, IEEE Access.

[19]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0 , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[20]  Zdenko Kovacic,et al.  Fuzzy Controller Design: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[21]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Process execution in Cyber-Physical Systems using cloud and Cyber-Physical Internet services , 2018, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[22]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[23]  Borja Bordel,et al.  An autonomous information device with e-paper display for personal environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[24]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: Extending pervasive sensing from control theory to the Internet of Things , 2017, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[25]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  Enhancing Process Control in Industry 4.0 Scenarios using Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl..

[26]  Ting Liu,et al.  Recent advances in convolutional neural networks , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Diego Sánchez de Rivera,et al.  Physical Processes Control in Industry 4.0-Based Systems: A Focus on Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, UCAmI.