Ontology-Based Automatic Annotation of Learning Content

This paper presents an ontology-based approach to automatic annotation of learning objects’ (LOs) content units that we tested in TANGRAM, an integrated learning environment for the domain of Intelligent Information Systems. The approach does not primarily focus on automatic annotation of entire LOs, as other relevant solutions do. Instead, it provides a solution for automatic metadata generation for LOs’ components (i.e., smaller, potentially reusable, content units). Here we mainly report on the content-mining algorithms and heuristics applied for determining values of certain metadata elements used to annotate content units. Specifically, the focus is on the following elements: title, description, unique identifier, subject (based on a domain ontology), and pedagogical role (based on an ontology of pedagogical roles). Additionally, as TANGRAM is grounded on an LO content structure ontology that drives the process of an LO decomposition into its constituent content units, each thus generated content unit is implicitly semantically annotated with its role/position in the LO’s structure. Employing such semantic annotations, TANGRAM allows assembling content units into new LOs personalized to the users’ goals, preferences, and learning styles. In order to provide the evaluation of the proposed solution, we describe our experiences with automatic annotation of slide presentations, one of the most common LO types.

[1]  Atanas Kiryakov,et al.  KIM - Semantic Annotation Platform , 2003, SEMWEB.

[2]  Jae-Moon Lee,et al.  Managing Content with Automatic Document Classification , 2004, J. Digit. Inf..

[3]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  Mining topic-specific concepts and definitions on the web , 2003, WWW '03.

[4]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Dynamic Assembly of Personalized Learning Content on the Semantic Web , 2006, ESWC.

[5]  Doug Downey,et al.  Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) , 2004, WWW '04.

[6]  Erik Duval,et al.  Towards a Global Component Architecture for Learning Objects: An Ontology Based Approach , 2004, OTM Workshops.

[7]  Erik Duval,et al.  A LOM Research Agenda , 2003, WWW.

[8]  Marc Ehrig,et al.  Relaxed Precision and Recall for Ontology Matching , 2005, Integrating Ontologies.

[9]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia , 1998, Springer Netherlands.

[10]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art , 2006, J. Web Semant..

[11]  Steffen Staab,et al.  eLearning based on the semantic web , 2001 .

[12]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[13]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata , 2002 .

[14]  Peter Dolog,et al.  Integrating Adaptive Hypermedia Techniques and Open RDF-based Environments , 2003, WWW.

[15]  Giuseppe Carenini,et al.  Extracting knowledge from evaluative text , 2005, K-CAP '05.

[16]  Doug Downey,et al.  Methods for Domain-Independent Information Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Comparison , 2004, AAAI.

[17]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Gimme' the context: context-driven automatic semantic annotation with C-PANKOW , 2005, WWW '05.

[18]  David R. Karger,et al.  Piggy Bank: Experience the Semantic Web inside your web browser , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[19]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  Towards Best Practices for Semantic Web Student Modelling , 2005, AIED.

[20]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[21]  C. Faron-Zucker,et al.  Semi-automated Semantic Annotation of Learning Resources by Identifying Layout Features , 2005 .

[22]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  Reusable Learning Objects: Current Status and Future Directions , 2003 .

[23]  Erik Duval,et al.  Automating metadata generation: the simple indexing interface , 2005, WWW '05.

[24]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Towards a Global Component Architecture for Learning Objects: A Slide Presentation Framework , 2005 .

[25]  Erik Duval,et al.  Ontology of Learning Object Content Structure , 2005, AIED.

[26]  Carsten Ullrich,et al.  The Learning-Resource-Type is Dead, Long Live the Learning-Resource-Type! , 2005 .

[27]  Erik Duval,et al.  Repurposing Learning Object Components , 2005, OTM Workshops.