Will understanding vision require a wholly empirical paradigm?

Based on electrophysiological and anatomical studies, a prevalent conception is that the visual system recovers features of the world from retinal images to generate perceptions and guide behavior. This paradigm, however, is unable to explain why visual perceptions differ from physical measurements, or how behavior could routinely succeed on this basis. An alternative is that vision does not recover features of the world, but assigns perceptual qualities empirically by associating frequently occurring stimulus patterns with useful responses on the basis of survival and reproductive success. The purpose of the present article is to briefly describe this strategy of vision and the evidence for it.

[1]  Dale Purves,et al.  The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Dale Purves,et al.  Properties of artificial neurons that report lightness based on accumulated experience with luminance , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[5]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Natural Image Statistics - A Probabilistic Approach to Early Computational Vision , 2009, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[6]  William T. Freeman,et al.  The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception , 1994, Nature.

[7]  D. Purves,et al.  Why we see what we do : an empirical theory of vision , 2003 .

[8]  D. Purves,et al.  Properties of artificial networks evolved to contend with natural spectra , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 2016 .

[10]  W. Geisler,et al.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , 2011, Vision Research.

[11]  Joel Davis.  Brain and Visual Perception: The Story of a 25-Year Collaboration , 2004 .

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[14]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  Natural Scene Statistics Account for the Representation of Scene Categories in Human Visual Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[16]  Dale Purves,et al.  The statistical structure of natural light patterns determines perceived light intensity. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Kuefer.  Psychophysics Introduction To Its Perceptual Neural And Social Prospects , 2016 .

[18]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[19]  Dale Purves,et al.  Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Konrad Paul Kording.  Bayesian statistics: relevant for the brain? , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[22]  D. Purves,et al.  How biological vision succeeds in the physical world , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D Purves,et al.  The extraordinarily rapid disappearance of entoptic images. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Cherlyn J. Ng,et al.  Network Connections That Evolve to Circumvent the Inverse Optics Problem , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Zhiyong Yang.  Vision as a Fundamentally Statistical Machine , 2012 .

[27]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  David H Brainard,et al.  A Bayesian model of lightness perception that incorporates spatial variation in the illumination. , 2013, Journal of Vision.

[29]  B. Love,et al.  The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Visual illusions and direct perception: Elaborating on Gibson's insights , 2015 .

[31]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Purves,et al.  Why we see what we do redux : a wholly empirical theory of vision , 2011 .

[33]  A. AlanGilchrist.  Seeing in Black and White , 2006 .

[34]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Vision and the Coding of Natural Images , 2000, American Scientist.

[35]  Si Wu,et al.  Efficient coding of natural images. , 2011, Sheng li xue bao : [Acta physiologica Sinica].