Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Disease Transmission Probability in Multiple‐Vector‐Transfer Designs

Plant disease is responsible for major losses in agriculture throughout the world. Diseases are often spread by insect organisms that transmit a bacterium, virus, or other pathogen. To assess disease epidemics, plant pathologists often use multiple-vector-transfers. In such contexts, groups of insect vectors are moved from an infected source to each of n test plants that will then be observed for developing symptoms of infection. The purpose of this paper is to present new estimators for p, the probability of pathogen transmission for an individual vector, motivated from an empirical Bayesian approach. We specifically investigate four such estimators, characterize their small-sample properties, and propose new credible intervals for p. These estimators remove the need to specify hyperparameters a priori and are shown to be easier to compute than the classical Bayes estimators proposed by Chaubey and Li (1995, Journal of Official Statistics 11, 1035-1046) and Chick (1996, Biometrics 52, 1055-1062). Furthermore, some of these estimators are shown to have better frequentist properties than the commonly used maximum likelihood estimator and to provide a smaller Bayes risk than the estimator proposed by Burrows (1987, Phytopathology 77, 363-365).

[1]  W. Swallow,et al.  Using group testing to estimate a proportion, and to test the binomial model. , 1990, Biometrics.

[2]  Keith H. Thompson,et al.  Estimation of the Proportion of Vectors in a Natural Population of Insects , 1962 .

[3]  J. Tebbs,et al.  Confidence interval procedures for the probability of disease transmission in Multiple-Vector-Transfer designs , 2004 .

[4]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[5]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .

[6]  Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver,et al.  A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions , 1994 .

[7]  W. Swallow Relative Mean Squared Error and Cost Considerations in Choosing Group Size for Group Testing to Estimate Infection Rates and Probabilities of Disease Transmission , 1987 .

[8]  J. Tebbs,et al.  More Powerful Likelihood Ratio Tests for Isotonic Binomial Proportions , 2003 .

[9]  W. Swallow,et al.  Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions , 1999, Biometrics.

[10]  William H. Swallow,et al.  Group testing for estimating infection rates and probabilities of disease transmission , 1985 .

[11]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[12]  J. Tebbs,et al.  An Empirical Bayes Group-Testing Approach to Estimating Small Proportions , 2003 .

[13]  M. A. Tanner,et al.  Tools for Statistical Inference: Methods for the Exploration of Posterior Distributions and Likelihood Functions, 3rd Edition , 1998 .

[14]  S. Lenardon,et al.  Infectivity in natural populations of Delphacodes kuscheli vector of Mal Río Cuarto virus , 1999 .

[15]  Sensitivity Analysis of Variable-Size Group Testing and its Related Continuous Models , 1995 .

[16]  Mid‐P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing , 2004 .

[17]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Bayesian Models for Limiting Dilution Assay and Group Test Data , 1996 .

[18]  M. Balzarini,et al.  Predictive model for Mal de Rio Cuarto disease intensity , 1995 .

[19]  S. Lenardon,et al.  Recent Outbreak of "Mal de Rio Cuarto" Virus on Corn in Argentina. , 1998, Plant disease.

[20]  R. Milne,et al.  Association of maize rough dwarf virus with Mal de Rio Cuarto in Argentina , 1983 .

[21]  G. Hepworth Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing , 1996 .

[22]  P. Burrows,et al.  Improved estimation of pathogen transmission rates by group testing , 1987 .