Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics

[1]  Jason Z. Kim,et al.  Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity , 2022, Communications Physics.

[2]  Bruce A. Weinberg,et al.  Women are credited less in science than men , 2022, Nature.

[3]  T. Dehdarirad,et al.  Gender differences in citation sentiment: A case study in life sciences and biomedicine , 2022, Journal of Information Science.

[4]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  One-Year Update from the Editor-in-Chief , 2021, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Nash.  Citational Desires: On Black Feminism's Institutional Longings , 2021, Diacritics.

[6]  Emőke-Ágnes Horvát,et al.  Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The gendered nature of authorship , 2021, Science advances.

[8]  Deb L. Marciano,et al.  Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions , 2021, Neuron.

[9]  R. Werner,et al.  Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles , 2021, JAMA network open.

[10]  A. Metaxas,et al.  Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science , 2021, PLoS biology.

[11]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Emergence of Structural Inequalities in Scientific Citation Networks , 2021, ArXiv.

[12]  S. Duma,et al.  Citation Diversity Statement in BMES Journals , 2021, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  D. Sweet.  New at Cell Press: The Inclusion and Diversity Statement , 2021, Cell.

[14]  E. Cech,et al.  Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM , 2021, Science Advances.

[15]  Katie Langin.  LGBTQ researchers say they want to be counted. , 2020, Science.

[16]  M. McKinnon,et al.  Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work , 2020 .

[17]  Bradley R. Postle,et al.  Statement from the Incoming Editor-in-Chief , 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Ballen,et al.  Teaching between the Lines: Representation in Science Textbooks. , 2020, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Eli J. Cornblath,et al.  dalejn/cleanBib: v1.1.1 , 2020 .

[20]  Maxwell A. Bertolero,et al.  Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender , 2020, bioRxiv.

[21]  Jordan D Dworkin,et al.  Gendered Citation Practices in the Field of Communication , 2020 .

[22]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  Gender (im)balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience , 2020, bioRxiv.

[23]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  A. Fairhall,et al.  Acknowledging female voices , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Widening the scope of diversity , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Laura B Sample McMeeking,et al.  Outperforming yet undervalued: Undergraduate women in STEM , 2020, PloS one.

[27]  Ash T. Zemenick,et al.  A scientist like me: demographic analysis of biology textbooks reveals both progress and long-term lags , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[28]  Z. Budrikis.  Growing citation gender gap , 2020, Nature Reviews Physics.

[29]  Gernot Wagner,et al.  Availability of risky geoengineering can make an ambitious climate mitigation agreement more likely , 2020, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[30]  M. Kwiek,et al.  Gender-Based Homophily in Research: A Large-Scale Study of Man-Woman Collaboration , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening , 2020, Science Advances.

[32]  Jordan D Dworkin,et al.  (In)citing Action to Realize an Equitable Future , 2020, Neuron.

[33]  E. Yan,et al.  The relationship between journal citation impact and citation sentiment: A study of 32 million citances in PubMed Central , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[34]  D. Kullmann.  Editorial. , 2020, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  P. Schwartzberg,et al.  Women in immunology: 2020 and beyond , 2020, Nature Immunology.

[36]  Kristin A. Linn,et al.  The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  E. Cech,et al.  LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations , 2020, ILR Review.

[38]  Riccardo Gallotti,et al.  Effects of homophily and academic reputation in the nomination and selection of Nobel laureates , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Imma Marín Queral.  Measuring Research: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. 2018. (Ressenya) , 2019 .

[40]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape , 2019, PloS one.

[41]  Patricia Hill Collins,et al.  Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory , 2019, The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory.

[42]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  E. Gibney.  Discrimination drives LGBT+ scientists to think about quitting , 2019, Nature.

[44]  R. Skibba.  Women in physics , 2019, Nature Reviews Physics.

[45]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  M. Jensen,et al.  Gender bias in Nobel prizes , 2018, Palgrave Communications.

[47]  Jon Freeman.  LGBTQ scientists are still left out , 2018, Nature.

[48]  Michelle L. Dion,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields , 2018, Political Analysis.

[49]  M. Ferguson,et al.  How gender determines the way we speak about professionals , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  L. Holman,et al.  Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences , 2018, bioRxiv.

[51]  Florian Lemmerich,et al.  Homophily at Academic Conferences , 2018, WWW.

[52]  L. V. Ugelvig,et al.  Gender equity at scientific events , 2018, Evolution letters.

[53]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? , 2018, PLoS biology.

[54]  Tamar Saguy,et al.  Bias against research on gender bias , 2018, Scientometrics.

[55]  Christina Friedlaender.  On Microaggressions: Cumulative Harm and Individual Responsibility , 2018, Hypatia.

[56]  Mayte Cantero Sánchez.  LIVING A FEMINIST LIFE , 2018 .

[57]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Erin Hengel,et al.  Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. , 2017 .

[59]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Sharing of science is most likely among male scientists , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[60]  J. Pilcher,et al.  Names and “Doing Gender”: How Forenames and Surnames Contribute to Gender Identities, Difference, and Inequalities , 2017, Sex Roles.

[61]  Daniel G. Cockayne,et al.  Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’ , 2017 .

[62]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  Activist Choice Homophily and the Crowdfunding of Female Founders* , 2017 .

[63]  Mohsen Jadidi,et al.  Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists , 2017, Adv. Complex Syst..

[64]  Andreas Neef,et al.  Gender bias in scholarly peer review , 2017, eLife.

[65]  M. Smyk,et al.  Author׳s gender affects rating of academic articles: Evidence from an incentivized, deception-free laboratory experiment , 2016 .

[66]  Neven Caplar,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts , 2016, Nature Astronomy.

[67]  M. Wyer,et al.  Scientist Spotlight Homework Assignments Shift Students’ Stereotypes of Scientists and Enhance Science Identity in a Diverse Introductory Science Class , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[68]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[69]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Stereotypes About Gender and Science , 2016 .

[70]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the Compliance of Women Engineers with a Gendered Scientific System , 2015, PloS one.

[71]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[73]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[74]  Laurel Smith‐Doerr,et al.  Gendered Networks: Professional Connections of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2014 .

[75]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[77]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals , 2013 .

[78]  Barbara F. Walter,et al.  The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.

[79]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .

[80]  L. Isbell,et al.  Stag Parties Linger: Continued Gender Bias in a Female-Rich Scientific Discipline , 2012, PloS one.

[81]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs , 2012 .

[83]  Anne E. Lincoln,et al.  The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s , 2012, Social studies of science.

[84]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students , 2011 .

[85]  Jessica J. Good,et al.  The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance , 2010, The Journal of social psychology.

[86]  Anne Boschini,et al.  Is Team Formation Gender Neutral? Evidence from Coauthorship Patterns , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[87]  M. Brooke,et al.  What’s the use? , 2006, Neurology.

[88]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Visibility matters: increasing knowledge of women's contributions to ecology , 2005 .

[89]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[90]  M. Rossiter.  The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science , 1993 .

[91]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Gender homophily in citations , 2018 .

[92]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  Making Feminist Points. , 2013 .

[93]  Derald Wing Sue,et al.  Microaggressions and marginality : manifestation, dynamics, and impact , 2010 .

[94]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Citances: Citation Sentences for Semantic Analysis of Bioscience Text , 2004 .